I had 2 more consultations for breast augmentation today, and now I'm even more confused. I'm a 36C (deflated C) and do have a small amount of sagging from nursing. One of the doctors I went to today said that he wanted to go under the muscle, and that I didn't need a lift. The other one (board certified plastic surgeon) said that he wanted to go over the muscle and use an HP implant because I have some drooping, but not enough for a lift.
What is the major difference between going over and under the muscle? Will going over really give me upper pole fullness? I had always heard that going under was best, but I was told that because I have a good amount of breast tissue, going under wouldn't look right, and going over would give me a bit of a lift as well. I liked both of the doctors today, and am so excited about getting a breast augmentation. I just have to figure out whether to go over or under. Please help!
Answers (32)
From board-certified doctors and trusted medical professionals
VOTED MOST HELPFUL
April 27, 2016
Answer: Not every patient benefits from one technique.
There are different techniques that surgeons use with their patients, including:
wearing an elastic garment that pushes down on the upper pole of the breast (Ace Wrap, specially designed bra, specially designed elastic strap, or what your doctor has recommended
manipulation or...
If the implant is too big, it may lead to complications.
One complication is sheerly from the weight of the implants and the effects of gravity. It is more likely that the breasts are going to sag if the sizing is not right for you. Symptoms associated with a lot of weight on the chest wall are...
Yes this is possible and may be recommended if you wish to be more full on top. A small implant can still give you overall smaller less heavy but still full breasts. However there are other ways to accomplish this at the time of your Breast Lift/Breast reduction. If you have been considering a...