Recently, I just found out that I have mild tubular breast and I did a lot of research. However, I do not want to place the implants. I have heard about the fat injection combined with Brava System. I wonder if it is ideal for my case. I don't want to have a lot of cups increase but just better shape and one cup increase.
November 12, 2009
Answer: Fat injection and Brava system for mild tubular breasts? Great question but a bad idea. As the other doctor posters have stated, you have more anatomic issues than can be solved with the Brava pump. It would truly be a waste of your time (months of wearing a very uncomfortable constricting device) and $$$$$. Be careful out there, if a doctor suggested this type of treatment than go get 3 more opinions from boarded plastic surgeons. Good luck and regards!
Helpful
November 12, 2009
Answer: Fat injection and Brava system for mild tubular breasts? Great question but a bad idea. As the other doctor posters have stated, you have more anatomic issues than can be solved with the Brava pump. It would truly be a waste of your time (months of wearing a very uncomfortable constricting device) and $$$$$. Be careful out there, if a doctor suggested this type of treatment than go get 3 more opinions from boarded plastic surgeons. Good luck and regards!
Helpful
November 11, 2009
Answer: Fat injection and Brava system for mild tubular breasts? Implicit in what you are proposing is the false premise that small tuberous breasts can be corrected with fat grafting and suction by the Brava system. That is not the case. First - Tuberous breasts are also more accurately called CONSTRICTED breasts and have been described as a Snoopy Dog (snout) Deformity. The base of the breast is held in by soft tissue fibers similar to how twine ropes are used to hold the branches of Christmas trees on sale on street corners. These fibers cause the breast to have the shape of a TUBER (or a root). To give them the shape they need to cover an implant (or anything else), the fibers (string) need to be cut - suction with Brava is NOT going to do it. (This is nicely done via a periareolar incision just before breast implant placement). Second - Although the Brava system has been out there for almost 10 years. It has very few fans because it is cumbersome, the results are not stable and they often relapse in NORMAL shaped breasts. Third. Fat grafting to the breast is increasingly done YET it remains VERY controversial. The female breast has a 1 in 11 chance of breast cancer. Placing fat grafts which are likely to die and leave calcified scar tissue in a cancer prone tissue which is usually surveyed with mammogram would make it hard on all but the most experienced mammography radiologists from telling dead fat calcium from calcium associated with breast cancer. This may translate to a lot of needless. preventable worrying in the future and and equal number of preventable breast biopsies. I would do more research. Peter A Aldea, MD
Helpful
November 11, 2009
Answer: Fat injection and Brava system for mild tubular breasts? Implicit in what you are proposing is the false premise that small tuberous breasts can be corrected with fat grafting and suction by the Brava system. That is not the case. First - Tuberous breasts are also more accurately called CONSTRICTED breasts and have been described as a Snoopy Dog (snout) Deformity. The base of the breast is held in by soft tissue fibers similar to how twine ropes are used to hold the branches of Christmas trees on sale on street corners. These fibers cause the breast to have the shape of a TUBER (or a root). To give them the shape they need to cover an implant (or anything else), the fibers (string) need to be cut - suction with Brava is NOT going to do it. (This is nicely done via a periareolar incision just before breast implant placement). Second - Although the Brava system has been out there for almost 10 years. It has very few fans because it is cumbersome, the results are not stable and they often relapse in NORMAL shaped breasts. Third. Fat grafting to the breast is increasingly done YET it remains VERY controversial. The female breast has a 1 in 11 chance of breast cancer. Placing fat grafts which are likely to die and leave calcified scar tissue in a cancer prone tissue which is usually surveyed with mammogram would make it hard on all but the most experienced mammography radiologists from telling dead fat calcium from calcium associated with breast cancer. This may translate to a lot of needless. preventable worrying in the future and and equal number of preventable breast biopsies. I would do more research. Peter A Aldea, MD
Helpful