Dysport, like Botox, is a neurotoxin. It’s made of the same type of bobotulinum toxin A as Botox, but has slightly different dosing technique and structure. Results seem to be about the same for both Dysport and Botox. However, while Dysport seems less expensive, it takes more units of Dysport to achieve the same results as Botox. In the end, the cost is usually about the same. Xeoman is another alternative. It's a form of botulism toxin that is used to block muscle movement in areas that contribute to wrinkles. Unlike filler, Xeomin only impacts muscle movement, and has no effect on filling deep wrinkles that have already formed. Consult with your doctor about these alternatives and whether or not they would be a best fit for you. You may also consider upping your units of Botox, depending on what've been doing now.
While, Hifu is truly a remarkable breakthrough in technology, a non-invasive alternative to a surgical face lift, and a FDA approved treatment with a specific intent for improvement of lines and wrinkles on the face and décolleté, it does depend on the desired "slim look" you're going for. From your pictures, I can see you where you may want a tighter look around your cheek bone area giving you the "lifting effect". If so, then you may want to consider juvederm voluma. It's also a non-surgical filler and would give you the desired "lift" you may be looking for. Voluma is a long lasting FDA approved facial filler, lasting up to 2 years or more. In fact, Voluma is the ONLY hyaluronic acid filler approved by the FDA to specifically contour and volumize the midface. Other fillers typically have a life cycle of between 6-9 months. All are painless and considering your options, and you may or may not need a single session. The doctor you go to would have to determine that for you.
