
View Before and Afters
Average Eyelid Surgery Cost: $3,875
Learn about Eyelid Surgery
2,269 people and 797 doctors are talking about Eyelid Surgery
Get Free Email Updates
“Devastated After Lower Eyelid Surgery - Washington, DC”
Spent: $5,000 in Washington, DC
Posted 25 Apr 2011
I went to PS for a consult on upper eyelids that were slightly drooping onto eyelashes. PS pointed out my tired look and showed me how he could also correct my bags under my eyes with a simple procedure to remove a little excess skin. I did not have a problem with the way I looked but he made me feel like I did have a problem. He made the correction seem so simple and convinced me to do it, and asked me to trust him that he was an expert in eye procedures. I asked if we could try a little filler between the tear rim and upper cheek bone but he said fillers were not very successful in this area (ironically this is what he is now suggesting to correct the problem!)
It is now 5 months post surgery and I am devastated by the result and am on verge of a nervous breakdown. My eyes which were originally large and my best feature are now smaller, more rounded, and pulled up in an unnatural way. He also took too much fat out below my eyes and they now have a hollowed sick look. I get physically ill when I look in the mirror.
I'm very confused about how to correct these problems. Some doctors say try filler (e.g Restylane) for the hollowness, others say I will need a fat graft. I'm scared to death to do anything else for fear it will be worse - but I hate the way I look and am desperate to try to fix it.
This review is the subjective opinion of a RealSelf member and not of RealSelf, Inc.
Helpful review?



What one doctor advised (on this site) was to first try a filler to see if you liked the results and then proceed to the fat graft. Use a highly recommended, qualified oculoplastic surgeon only for this as their specialty is eyes. There may something else that could be done to make you feel better. Your eyes will not look normal until almost one year post-op due to the swelling which distorts (eye) tissues. They start to look much better after 6 months, but continue to improve thereafter. Get a second and third opinion so you know what you are dealing with & what you can realistically expect.
Re my surgeon - the sad thing is that he is one of the most highly regarded doctors in the country. Highly reputable and on the PS board if not the chairman. If I can't trust a doctor with his credentials I'm not sure who I can trust.
It's all so depressing. Does anyone know a good shrink for disfigurement that takes phone appointments?
I contacted both Dr. Meronk's and Dr. Parsa's offices in CA and have scheduled an appointment for a consult. I'll be in CA for a wedding in May and decided it wouldn't hurt to talk to both of them who appear to specialize in eyelid correction surgery. I talked to the receptionists at both of their offices at length and they said it is a huge problem and people come from all over the world seeking help. It's just so sad.
I am also scheduled for a consult with Dr. Perman in DC, and Dr. Grant at John's Hopkins in Baltimore.
Have either of you heard anything about any of these doctors?
It's so nice to have you both to consult with and to talk to:)
My surgery involved a canthoplasty, which resulted in a most unnatural slant to my eyes, along with a shortening of the horizontal plane. Now my beautiful eyes are small and my face no longer resembles that of my old self. I went through a major depression as a result, unable to leave my house for a couple of years. I am no longer ashamed that I was so vain, but angry at the arrogance of my former surgeon. I write this with the full realization that he and his colleagues at Paces have been a God-send for many who have undergone revisions. But I want to warn others who may not know to ask precisely what technique will be utilized in their surgeries, especially when they are first-time patients.
Did you complain to him about your result?
Yet at my one-month appointment, he admitted that a tarsorrhaphy was done in order to prevent my eye from opening and falling. I was still very upset and worried that my eyes would be permanently changed but agreed to remain calm and allow some time for my eyes to heal for them to go back to their normal size and shape, which of course they never did. More research indicated that he had performed a canthoplasty, which I would have never agreed to, given the invasiveness of the procedure, its nature (which was contraindicated for my goals) and the permanence. However, during my six-month appointment, he denied having performed the canthoplasty, and dismissed me. I later came upon a professional paper that McCord authored in which he admitted to performing a cantholpasty in all his surgeries, not just the revisions but also the initial blephs and cheeklifts, in order to prevent ectropion. I saved that paper but never confronted him. Why bother?
Of course, I have the telltale small, slanted eyes and the little knot on my lateral orbital rim that says otherwise. I never went back, but sunk into a deep depression. After two years, my savings were exhausted and I had to get back to work. Complicating matters is that I am a PhD and my field happens to frown upon women who wear makeup, let alone those who have cosmetic surgery. Dr. McCord knew this (assuming he was actually paying attention, which I believe he was) before my surgery. I reiterated just how important it was for me NOT to look "done" or different in any way. He even went back over my goals on the morning of surgery, asking me if I wanted him to turn the lower lid slightly outward (because it was a popular request at the time) or if I wanted him to change the axis to make it more like (I can't remember the supermodel's name). As tempting as it was (sarcasm), I said, no, you'd better keep them the way they are. I also was assured that I would be presentable (with concealer) in approximately two weeks and could return to work. Ironically, one of the main reasons I elected to have this surgery was because I was finding myself more dependent on concealer and eye shadow, and I wanted simply to get back to the way I was at a younger time, sans makeup.
Even more ironically, the only way now that I can make myself resemble my former self is to rely on eye liner and shadow. The little raised lump where the hole was drilled and my canthus attached? No amount of shadow can hide that. And I need eyeliner because my lashes never grew back where the corners of my eyes were sewn together.
I suppose I have digressed here, so to answer your initial point regarding the aggressiveness--yes--I believe that technique is very aggressive, and while I realize that I'm not an expert, I have read that same opinion expressed by a number of the experts who post on this board. If you do a search for canthoplasty, that is. The consensus seems to be that a canthoplasty ALWAYS results in a smaller eye and in most cases, an unnatural upward tilt.
I can't speak to your friend's case as you said she had a revision performed, but you didn't specify why. I'd be interested to know if you care to say more. My understanding is that a canthoplasty is oftentimes necessary in a lower bleph revision--especially when the lid has been lowered far below its normal axis and the skin so stretched out that the eyes have lost their ability to close. In those cases it makes sense that the surgeon would have to shorten the canthus and stabilize it by affixing it to the orbital rim, but to take an eye that has a good shape and no laxity and perform such an invasive procedure? Yes, very aggressive.
I believe that we need to keep on complaining, otherwise these egocentric doctors will just keep butchering women. Write to any organisations that he claims membership of and state your case. Do not let him get away with this.Even though time has passed I believe it is still important to let them know how the surgery has affected your life. These doctors bank on the fact that we will just go into hiding forever. Surely there must be some organisation that you can contact that acts as a "watchdog" for medical procedures.These doctors really must be stopped!!