Sclerotherapy Reviews
58%
WORTH IT RATING
"Worth It Rating" shows the % of consumer reviewers
that stated the procedure was "Worth It" or not.
See more RealSelf Worth It Ratings
or Add Your Review
View Before and Afters
Average Sclerotherapy Cost: $375
Learn about Sclerotherapy
138 people and 116 doctors are talking about Sclerotherapy
Get Free Email Updates
“It Mostly Worked - Bay Area, CA”
Vein1
Worth It
Spent: $400 in San Francisco Bay Area
Spent: $400 in San Francisco Bay Area
Posted 15 Jul 2011
First several weeks, legs looked horrible (black and blue), but once they cleared up, I see results.
This review is the subjective opinion of a RealSelf member and not of RealSelf, Inc.
Helpful review?
My Doctor: Join for free to view doctor's name
My rating:
Doctor's Bedside Manner
Answered My Questions
After Care Follow-Up
Time Spent With Me
Phone or Email Responsiveness
Staff Professionalism & Courtesy
Payment Process
Wait Times
Hi Vein,
Wow, your legs look great! Sounds like you had an easy procedure, but the bruising does look a bit painful.
Thanks so much,
-Britt
hi I have spider veins on my thighs, inner thighs, inner knee & back of my legs I've had since I was 18 years now I'm 31
I have had 7 sclero's over the years and I always got 90 percent or better removal. I never bruised like you did and he used too large of a needle. I recently went to a local dermatologist and got no results! Some are just better then others and look to see before and after pics and testimonials. It usually costs 300 per treatment and it takes one or two.
Could you tell me now frequently new spider veins appeared after treatments, and if you think they did so more quickly than they would have without the sclerotherapy? I have read that vitamin K treatment lotion can in some cases make them worse. And since using it myself now for two months, the number of veins on my legs have tripled! So I am considering schler but am wary....