Considering silicone rather than saline, which of the two approach procedures came about first in the industry ? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the two ? Is it true that sub-glandular will give a more 'fake' look ? Whereas sub-fascial offers a little more natural support for larger sized implants such as 700 cc silicone ?
Answer: Sub-glandular versus sub-fascial? Thank you for the question. There are pros and cons to the placement of breast implants in the “sub muscular” position versus the "sub glandular position”. The vast majority of breast implants placed in the "sub muscular" position are really being placed in the "dual plane" position ( partially sub muscular, partially sub glandular).
Helpful 2 people found this helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW Answer: Sub-glandular versus sub-fascial? Thank you for the question. There are pros and cons to the placement of breast implants in the “sub muscular” position versus the "sub glandular position”. The vast majority of breast implants placed in the "sub muscular" position are really being placed in the "dual plane" position ( partially sub muscular, partially sub glandular).
Helpful 2 people found this helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW September 2, 2015
Answer: Subglandular or subfascial? I feel that this difference is more a marketing tool than anything which will provide a different results. In general, I strongly recommend augmentation underneath the pectoralis muscle to give the best and most natural results. Sub glandular or subfascial implants have substantial disadvantages that I try to avoid!The most important thing in choosing the correct breast augmentation is to find a surgeon who is certified by the American Board of plastic surgery.I wish you the best!Dr. Gabbay.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW September 2, 2015
Answer: Subglandular or subfascial? I feel that this difference is more a marketing tool than anything which will provide a different results. In general, I strongly recommend augmentation underneath the pectoralis muscle to give the best and most natural results. Sub glandular or subfascial implants have substantial disadvantages that I try to avoid!The most important thing in choosing the correct breast augmentation is to find a surgeon who is certified by the American Board of plastic surgery.I wish you the best!Dr. Gabbay.
Helpful
Book a virtual consultation
CONTACT NOW
September 1, 2015
Answer: Which Plane? I think that in general sub-muscular is a better approach than sub-glandular. I think it looks more natural, it is better supported, and since tells us there is less capsular contracture. Oh and less symmastia.As far as subfascial, Let me quote John Tebbetts, "Is adding less than a millimeter of additional soft-tissue coverage over a breast implant logical compared with adding more than 100 times that amount of coverage, if techniques are available that equalize tradeoffs and morbidity of subfascial versus pectoralis coverage?" (In October 2004 PRS)So I do not think a thin layer of fascia adds a lot.
Helpful
Book a consultation
CONTACT NOW September 1, 2015
Answer: Which Plane? I think that in general sub-muscular is a better approach than sub-glandular. I think it looks more natural, it is better supported, and since tells us there is less capsular contracture. Oh and less symmastia.As far as subfascial, Let me quote John Tebbetts, "Is adding less than a millimeter of additional soft-tissue coverage over a breast implant logical compared with adding more than 100 times that amount of coverage, if techniques are available that equalize tradeoffs and morbidity of subfascial versus pectoralis coverage?" (In October 2004 PRS)So I do not think a thin layer of fascia adds a lot.
Helpful
Book a consultation
CONTACT NOW
FIND THE RIGHT
TREATMENT FOR YOU
September 4, 2015
Answer: Implant types and positions Silicone implants were available first, starting in the mid 1960's. They were placed in the subglandular position and had a lot of complications, such as capsular contracture, so that alternatives were devised. Implants were placed behing the chest wall muscles and saline implants were used. Both of these helped with capsular contracture but also caused some issues of their own. Silicone implants were off of the market for almost 20 years, while the FDA reviewed their safety data but now are available. Choosing the implant type and the anatomic position for each patient is a very individual surgeon and patient choice and no way is better than the others in all situations.
Helpful
September 4, 2015
Answer: Implant types and positions Silicone implants were available first, starting in the mid 1960's. They were placed in the subglandular position and had a lot of complications, such as capsular contracture, so that alternatives were devised. Implants were placed behing the chest wall muscles and saline implants were used. Both of these helped with capsular contracture but also caused some issues of their own. Silicone implants were off of the market for almost 20 years, while the FDA reviewed their safety data but now are available. Choosing the implant type and the anatomic position for each patient is a very individual surgeon and patient choice and no way is better than the others in all situations.
Helpful
September 3, 2015
Answer: Subfascial vs subglandular breast augmentation The difference between these two locations is virtually negligible, especially when it comes to supporting an implant that is 700cc.Silicone was available first; the primary advantage is a more natural feel.
Helpful
September 3, 2015
Answer: Subfascial vs subglandular breast augmentation The difference between these two locations is virtually negligible, especially when it comes to supporting an implant that is 700cc.Silicone was available first; the primary advantage is a more natural feel.
Helpful
