Get the real deal on beauty treatments—real doctors, real reviews, and real photos with real results.Here's how we earn your trust.

POSTED UNDER EndyMed 3Deep REVIEWS

Endymed PRO 3Deep Not Worth It! London, GB

ORIGINAL POST

2 years ago, in my mid-thirties, I began...

London Lady
$2,700
2 years ago, in my mid-thirties, I began researching skin tightening treatments as my face was beginning to show signs of sag. I'd had pleasant, yet temporary lifting results from gentle salon radiofrequency treatments and wanted to try something longer-lasting. I was intrigued by Endymed PRO 3Deep, which promised to be a cheaper, less painful, more effective treatment than Thermage, without the risks of fat loss. I was excited to discover it was being unveiled at Sk:n Clinics in London and went along to an open evening with one of their doctors to find out more. Apparently it uses Tripolar rather than Bipolar radiofrequency, which was supposed to be more targeted and therefore safer. A course of 6 treatments was recommended, with results visible after 3 months once new collagen had formed. I signed up for the course and received a 20% discount.

The treatments were mostly fine, just a sensation of warmth with several unpleasantly hot zaps, but there were never any burns, welts, bruises or swelling. Just a little tenderness for a day or two. During the treatments, gel was applied to the skin which was then zapped in sections. The skin had to be heated to (and remain at) 40 degrees C in order to stimulate collagen synthesis.

3 months after the last treatment, I'd had very little lifting/tightening. I went back to the clinic for the final follow-up and complained of my lack of results. The practitioner was surprised, they'd had good results with other patients - she said. The manager kindly offered me 3 further complimentary treatments. Coincidentally, the Endymed machine had been moved to another clinic so I saw a different practitioner. I could tell immediately that her technique was better. Nevertheless, the results were still unsatisfactory for the amount of time and money invested. All in all, I noticed a 20% improvement to the jowl area, whilst the undereyes and eyebrows seemed to respond slightly better, perhaps a 40-50% improvement. This was a very approximate evaluation - I never saw any of the before or after photos at the clinic and just relied on my own observation. Certainly the results were not enough for anyone to notice.

If the treatment had been considerably cheaper this might not have been such a disappointing result, but for the price I paid it just wasn't worth it. Interestingly, Sk:n Clinics don't seem to be offering the treatment any more, so perhaps they felt it didn't live up to expectations either.

I've just had Ultherapy instead, having been advised that ultrasound skin tightening can be effective on those who do not respond to radiofrequency. Updates on that to follow.

London Lady's provider

Sk:n Clinic

London Lady ratings

Overall rating
Doctor's bedside manner
Answered my questions
After care follow-up
Time spent with me
Phone or email responsiveness
Staff professionalism & courtesy
Payment process
Wait times

It was 2 years ago, so I don't remember the names of the practitioners. But the first one, whilst pleasant, turned out to be inexperienced. The second was more professional, the treatments were smoother and more comfortable. Perhaps my results would have been marginally better had she performed the entire course.

Replies (5)

User Avatar
May 2, 2015

Welcome to the community - I am so glad that you took the time to share your personal experience with 3DEEP with us. Do you have any photos to share with the community? Since you're going to be trying Ultherapy, I thought I would suggest that you write a separte review to document your procedure, this way you can connect with others in the community who have had or are thinking about having Ultherapy. Here is link to get you started. I thought that you might also find this video helpful: 


View more RealSelf Ultherapy videos

Best of luck on your future treatments. :)

September 23, 2015
Did you really expect to have more than a 20% rebuilding of collagen after years of father time? The actual comparison can only be done through pictures. Plastic surgeons have patients who report no visible change following procedures UNTIL they pull out the before & after pics. If any procedure rebuilds 20% of the lost collagen in your skin & your expectations are higher than that, you might reconsider realigning your expectations back down a few notches. It takes YEARS to have breaks in elastin fibers & collagen breakdown. How can anyone expect to have even one year of treatments of any kind to restore it by 40 or 60%? Lasers are incredible & we can do more now than we ever did. If someone is telling you that a 45 year old woman will have the skin of a 25 year old after their "package," you better run. No invasive or non-invasive procedure is capable of doing that. Skin Restoration takes time, dedication and patience...no doubt about that one!
October 5, 2015
I was referring to visible improvements to the overall tone of my skin, rather than actual increased collagen levels! As far as I'm aware, none of these non-invasive skin treatments have any way of measuring your collagen levels, although that would certainly be very helpful. In any case, I've had more success with Ultherapy.
October 11, 2016
I don't think it is the client's expectations, but the practitioners who promote their latest gizmo to restore/repair/tone etc. collagen and elastin and lift and etc. I have been reading a lot of mixed reviews about the Endymed Radio Frequency with microneedling. A spa where I live just got it and is promoting it. I don't know if this person also had microneedling but if not, maybe the two are better than one. But no matter, I think the makers and sellers are the ones ratcheting up expectations.
November 30, 2016
Hi, how did ultherapy go?