POSTED UNDER Cellulaze REVIEWS
It Didn't Work - Grand Rapids, MI
ORIGINAL POST
I got this surgery back in September and it's...
k.m.January 5, 2014
$6,600
I got this surgery back in September and it's January now. I see ZERO results. I was told to wait a year but I'm not convinced that this has worked. My butt and thighs are still sensitive so I'm not fully healed but I heard you should see results after 4 months. I see absolutely nothing and feel bad about wasting so much money. I have grade 1 cellulite, and I'm in my twenties. Is waiting the answer or did this just not work for me?
UPDATED FROM k.m.
4 months post
Pictures
k.m.January 12, 2014
Here are some photos of what I look like 4 months later. I don't see a difference at all.
Replies (24)
January 14, 2014
It is not uncommon to have incomplete resolution after Cellulaze. If you were my patient I would revise the treated areas free of charge.

January 15, 2014
Thank you for commenting. I've done a lot of research and most of what I've read says that results turn out well. I do not want to go through with this again. At this point I'll just accept it. What would a surgeon do for a patient with an undesired outcome besides what you suggested?
January 15, 2014
Sometimes it's good just to have the peace of mind that an unbiased second opinion can bring.

January 20, 2014
Thank you for posting a picture. Make sure to give yourself a full 6 months before seeing your final results, some patients may see results sooner. Be patient and you will notice the lumpy dimpling skin to smooth out.
March 9, 2015
Dr Katz I wish you would answer her other questions honestly. She had written one at six. Months that she had no results and posted the stock answer of 3-6 months to see results...she said she was at six months....you keep giving that answer as if you have it ready to copy and paste. Start answering questions ....and Cellulaze hurts very much. Maybe some of you should get some done and then you can answer more honestly and with more feeling than a press clipping... I am sorry but read what these people are asking
March 9, 2015
Thank you Francesca! You hit the nail on the head when you asked him to answer my question honestly. I thought the same thing myself. It does look like a copy and paste bs answer to me too.

March 9, 2015
hahahahaha lmao over here at your comment. It is quite interesting that cosmetic surgeons 9 out of 10 times look like they never had anything done to their face or body and look like they frankly don't give a crap what they look like. It's us, sad, insecure women that they feed on.
February 11, 2014
I had Cellulaze in June 2009 & I literally saw noticeable results (exactly to the week) 6 months later in December 2009. Hang in there and be glad you did it in September! You should be set for a spring break. My results were great where it was done and I just had the remainder cellulazed. Seriously, it takes the entire 6 months especially for thin Caucasian skin :)

June 13, 2014
2009, I don't think that could be the right year? Cellulaze showed up in the beginning of 2012 and has been disappointing most women ever since .....
February 26, 2015
You are correct, my years were off! As you can see from my BELATED reply, I am time challenged. I had it within months of approval by a trial doctor who, in hindsight, possibly did not have the time to do my entire legs or just didn't need to perform that much for the other observing doctors because I offered to pay for it all and begged him to do it. He never explained but did suggest it was not an area for cellulaze and another type of procedure would solve, giving me the name of doctor who performs butt surgeries. He stopped right where my (longer) shorts end, upper thigh/lower buttock and I had a defined line where he stopped- that is how dramatic the results were. Another surgeon, Dr. Blinski agreed with me that it was purely a skin issue and another cellulaze fixed it in 2014 but gee.... My time challenged self needs to do a two cellulaze review!! I recovered from Dr. Blinski's cellulaze in less than 2 weeks compared to 2-3 months with my first doctor, Dr. DiBernardo. I owe it to Dr. Blinski to gather all those pictures and do a review but until then all I can say is that he is the bomb- honest, thorough and affordable. I wasted time and money going to who had headed the trials when I could have stayed in my own state, saved money and found someone who cared more about what I wanted and needed than other priorities. I cannot complain about my results with Dr. DiBernardo, they were remarkable enough that I got that decidedly marked line right below the "banana area" but that just called attention to the area he refused to address.
February 27, 2015
Cellulaze is a scam. It has been a YEAR AND A HALF and so far NOTHING. I look exactly the same if not maybe worse and suffered psychologically from the pain and knowing the doctor lied to me. Six months after I had the procedure, he says "well I told you you wouldn't see much of a result because you didn't have it that bad to begin with." He never said such a thing BEFORE the procedure. Him and his staff said I was the perfect candidate and there is nothing to worry about. They say cellulaze is "minimally invasive" which is balony. It took 10 months for the tingling to go away, and a year and a half later, I'm still in a little bit of pain. It's going away but very slowly. How the hell do you call that minimally invasive?! I will never trust or go to a cosmetic surgeon again. They're only after money. I hope the one who did my procedure burns in hell.

February 28, 2015
I wonder if it does depend on a doctor. I saw improvements but it is still disappointing that I have cellulite leftover. Now I'm trying to workout and starve myself so I can lose the rest without any proof that it will actually happen. Sigh. I'm sorry about your bad experience. Cosmetic surgery is a gamble. :(

October 14, 2015
Thanks! I am 4 weeks post and see no improvement, I have moderate-severe cellulite. Did you see any improvement before 6 months?
Thanks
Thanks
March 9, 2015
i see a some differences but...I am with you the dimples should be less noticeable
March 9, 2015
Actually I took those photos 6 months after the surgery and the only difference is the lighting. I asked the office to give me their before and after and truly there is no difference whatsoever. I want to say I looked slightly worse...there's a mark on my left thigh that's more pronounced now than it was before the surgery.
March 15, 2015
I must say....you have the cutest butt...lol I wish mine looked like that
March 16, 2015
Thank you :) I just wish I never resorted to this and instead did personal training. This surgery was the worst thing that has ever happened to me. I was lied to by that surgeon. If he would have told me the truth I would have never done it.
March 13, 2015
Its hard to compare in 2 different lightings but I absolutely think it looks better. You look great.
March 14, 2015
No....these are not before & after photos. They were both taken on the same day. I look exactly the same trust me. I know my own body. This surgery has done nothing but wreck my life for a year and a half. I'm still recovering from the pain. It's pretty invasive unlike they say...it took 10 months for the tingling to go away and my thighs are still a little tender although the pain is going away slowly. Very slowly.
March 14, 2015
Well cellulite looks vastly different in different lighting. The second cure looks better.
Are you going to post a post-treatment picture?
March 16, 2015
These are post-treatment. I didn't do a "before" photo but I assure you the before & after are exactly the same. The second picture is taken on the exact day as the first and in the same location too. It just looks different because of the lighting.
Replies (15)