Botox or filler for NL/angularis ori area & sunken cheeks?
Doctor Answers 8
"The Nonsurgical 3D Vectoring Lift" Works Well For Nonsurgically Improving Early Sagging And Jowling
Fortunately, over the last decade our understanding of how our skin ages has undergone a revolution. Whereas once the visible signs of facial and neck aging were attributed exclusively to skin laxity or looseness, today, we know that the sagging, drooping, wrinkling, textural alterations, etc that characterize the passage of time are a result of a number of anatomical and physiological events. These include loss in the quality and quantity of collagen and elastic fibers, largely due to years of accumulated sun exposure and other environmental damage; an increase in facial expression muscle activity (hyperkinesis); loss of facial volume (due to decreases in fat, bone, cartilage and muscle); weakening of the retaining ligaments that suspend and hold the skin and underlying tissues in place; and the fragmentation and downward displacement--due to the effects of gravity--of the fat compartments that are responsible for giving fullness, smoothness, and youthful contour to the face and neck. The result of this gravitational pull on compromised, devolumized facial tissue is that the face loses its youthful triangular shape and takes on a more boxy look as the jowls and neck sag.
Today, we can address many aging skin changes nonsurgically in a matter of minutes with little or no downtime. For muscle overactivity, we have neuromodulators, such as Botox, Dysport and Xeomin. For roughness, textural changes, skin dullness and mottled pigmentation, we have topical prescription medications, chemical peels, medical microneedling, etc. For fine wrinkles, we have fillers and for deeper furrows and volume loss, we have developed volumizing injectable fillers. And, for sagging skin and apparent laxity, we have the Nonsurgical 3D Vectoring Lift.
A vector describes a magnitude and direction of force. Aging skin is characterized by a negative downward and inward vector of sagging. To counter this, surgeons traditionally pulled skin upward and outward--i.e. using a positive vector. The key difference between the outcomes of traditional surgical correction and nonsurgical 3D vectoring, both of which lift upwards and outwards, is the Nonsurgical 3D Vectoring Lift's additional corrective dimension of ‘forward projection’. This 3D effect is the result of volumizing with the use of injectable agents designed for this purpose, such as Radiesse, Voluma, Restylane SQ, and Stylage XXL.
The Nonsurgical 3D Vectoring Lift is predicated upon the fact that the face and portions of the neck differ in their degree of mobility. The region directly in front and behind the ears is a fixed, denser, relatively immobile area, in contrast to the mid-cheek region (hence the greater tendency of this region to sag with the passage of time). These anatomical differences are exploited in the Nonsurgical 3D Vectoring Lift by making the fixed areas serve as anchoring points for the mobile tissues.
In determining the positive vectors for the mid to lower face, the tissues that require lifting are identified by pulling the skin directly in front of the ears in a direction perpendicular to the area that requires correction. If the pulling results in lifting of the desired tissue, then the vector has been correctly identified and is then marked in accordance with 3D vectoring protocol. A similar approach is used in the region of the bone in back of the ear when dealing with neck laxity. One the proper vectors are marked, the volumizing agents are injected in a series of radiating bands that serve as support struts to the skin and that impart the necessary 3D outward projection--the lift--that distinguishes and defines this nonsurgical approach. The high viscosity and elasticity of the volumizing fillers serves to hold and re-support the overlying tissue and restore more youthful contours.
Although volumizing fillers are reabsorbed over time, they do promote new, native collagen synthesis, which may continue to provide structure, firmness and improved skin quality while continuing to lift tissues. A typical Nonsurgical 3D Vectoring Lift of the face takes about fifteen minutes to perform. Bruising and swelling tend to be minimal, and most people can return to work or social activities immediately following treatment.
In a nutshell, what all this means is that by directly treating the smile lines by simply filling them is merely treating a "symptom," rather than directly addressing the "disease." Consultation with a board certified aesthetic physician with extensive experience and expertise in nonsurgical facial volumization would be strongly advised.
Consider deeper injections
Good diagram! I don't know where the injector is placing the filler, but in general I try to place the filler as close to the buccal fat pad pocket as possible. I use a microcannula for filler injections. When filling hollowness below the cheekbone AKA gaunt appearance, I am trying to fill the deeper buccal fat pad pocket which is adjacent to the cheekbone, and under the zygomaticus smiling muscles. I am trying to keep the surface skin of the face thin, and build a deep and solid foundation which fills the "valleys" but not the peaks (the cheek bones.) I suspect the zygomaticus muscles and the natural buccal fat pad pocket helps to keep the filler in place and keeps it from sliding down. In general, the skin of the cheek feels smooth and you cannot feel the filler, since it is injected deeply where the natural "baby fat" AKA buccal fat pad was lost or diminished.
If the filler is injected directly under the skin where the hollow below the cheekbone is located, this filler will be very obvious and you can feel the filler directly in the skin. I have injected using this technique, and for some reason it does seem to go away quickly and does not stay in place. I have tried it several times in the past. It appears to be filled when the patient leaves the office, but when I see them in follow up, the hollowness/indentation reappears.
I suspect if it is injected over the zygomaticus muscle, it may migrate downwards towards the nasolabial fold and perhaps make it even heavier. The zygomaticus muscles are connected to the nasolabial, so if the filler is under these muscles it helps to keep the filler "tucked in," instead of over the muscles which may account for the additional heaviness and "overbuilt" description you used.
I also agree with the other doctors, that it is difficult to answer your question accurately without photos, but some of your description and diagram seemed to be similar to some of the experiences I have had in the past, so I wanted to at least give some of my thoughts.
P.S. There is a new feature on Realself, which is the "Follow" button. It is similar to the "Like" button on Facebook. If you like my response or any of the doctor responses while you research on Realself, you should "Follow" them. You will get email updates, when the doctors you follow post any new answers to questions, post new photos, or have any new reviews.
Botox or Filler
Though it is impossible to make accurate recommendations without an in person consultation, I have found that addressing sunken cheeks first can make the overall facial appearance better after which other areas like the nasolabial folds and pre-jowls can be addressed more effectively, if needed at all. I have been very happy with the results of Voluma, which is a Juvederm product that was recently FDA approved for volumizing the cheeks and can last up to 2 years. I suggest speaking with your injectionist about whether Voluma may be right for you, or if you feel like your current provider isn't achieving the look you're hoping for, seeking a consultation with another physician or highly experienced nurse injector for their recommendations.
You might also like...
Facial Aging and Fillers
Fillers for gaunt face with jowls and prominent modeolus
Gaunt face/NL folds
Filler in cheeks not Botox
The newest filler, Voluma, is made for cheek filling and lasts up to two years. This may be the right option for you. Botox is not the best option for your issue.
Sometimes a lfft is the only way to correct excess skin. Find a physician in your area for a consultation to review all of your options to make an informed decision.