Follicular Unit Extraction or Strip for Hair Transplant?

Which of the procedure is better for Hair transplant: Follicular unit extraction or strip hair transplant?

Doctor Answers 22

FUE or Strip

I don't think there is a "Gold" standard to any hair transplant procedure regarding FUE vs Strip/FUT. There are many factors which determine whether a patient is a better candidate for a Strip vs FUE procedure. For example I may see a patient who is 35 years old, wears his hair short, and has recession of hair in the angles in which he wants to correct. This patient needs 1,000-1,500 grafts. The patient tells me that he absolutely does not want a strip due to the chance of a linear scar in his head. For this patient the "Gold" standard is not strip method, it is FUE method. There are many circumstances which make one procedure better than the other and that is patient dependent. In my mind, Gold standard has to do with the technique and quality of the procedure. With FUE punch sizes smaller than 1.0mm should be used with minimal transection rate, the grafts need to be stored appropriately, sites need to be created to match the grafts, and placement of the grafts needs to be done by experienced staff to minimize trauma to the follicle. This to me is a "Gold" Standard.

Irvine Hair Restoration Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 24 reviews


For over 10 years, follicular unit grafting (FUG) which is the strip procedure has been the gold standard. Over the past 3 years, follicular unit extraction (FUE) has grown in popularity, and it now constitutes around 20% of the hair procedures I perform.
FUE has one main advantage- the absence of any linear donor site scar, thus permitting the patient to shave his head if desired.
The downsides of the FUE procedure are several: typically a lower percentage of hair regrowth (for most patients an 80 to 85% rate of regrowth vs. 90plus % with FUG; higher cost; difficulty of obtaining a large number of grafts- anything more than 1500 or so requires 2 consecutive days of procedures; and the need to shave the head in the donor area.
However, FUE is still the procedure of choice for young men, men of African American ethnicity, those who have depleted their donor supplies from prior work, and those who wish to have the option of shaving the head.

Jeffrey Epstein, MD, FACS
Miami Facial Plastic Surgeon
4.7 out of 5 stars 132 reviews


Both techniques have advantages and disadvantages.  Below are the pros and cons of each:

Follicular Unit Extraction


  • no linear scar on the back of the head
  • almost limitless donor especially if body hair can be used


  • time intensive sometimes requiring several days to complete  a large case
  • lower individual graft survival rate (75% vs 90%)
  • cost usually 50% higher per graft

Follicular Unit Grafting


  • more time efficient
  • higher individual graft survival


  • linear scar on the back of the head (usually not noticeable)

I don't think this is an issue of one being better or worse than the other technique, but rather a question of which technique is right for individual patient problems.  I feel FUE is best suited to very young patients (teens or early 20's) with an unpredictable future pattern of hair loss, people who want to shave or cut their hair very short, and those who can't tolerate the risk of a scar.  I still think FUG is the treatment of choice and the gold standard against which other techniques should be compared.

John Bitner, MD
Salt Lake City Facial Plastic Surgeon
4.9 out of 5 stars 89 reviews

Which procedure is best?

Though the results of either FUE/Neograft or strip will be very similar in the graft sites, the donor area will be quite different.  If you like to wear your hair short or would consider doing so in the future, this can be problematic if you have a strip procedure done that results in a long linear scar on the back of the head.  This is one of the main reasons so many men are choosing Neograft/FUE instead of the traditional strip procedure. So if future scarring is a concern, then Neograft could be the procedure for you.

Grant Stevens, MD
Los Angeles Plastic Surgeon
4.7 out of 5 stars 147 reviews

Which method is the best ?

We can not say that Fue method is better than Fut or the opposite. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages .  Fue method can be used for small balding areas . For wide balding areas I prefer to combine Fue and Fut methods in order to be able to extract high amount of grafts and to cover larger portions of balding area such as yours . For anybody that has little knowledge of the hair transplant industry, the similarities between the names of FUE and FUT might be misleading. In reality, both are very different forms of treatment and while some individuals will have the luxury of casting a decision based on their own research and personal preference, others will have to let their own circumstances dictate which procedure they utilise. In summarising the procedures, it can be concluded that FUE is certainly the option for those individuals who might consider a shorter hair style in the future, if they are not planning one immediately. FUT on the other hand is a more general form of treatment and is designed for those patients that would rather have better quality hair – even if it means keeping it that bit longer to hide the nasty scarring that can occur with the treatment.All the best 

Ilker Apaydin, MD
Turkey Plastic Surgeon
4.9 out of 5 stars 30 reviews


Earlier on, I performed the FUT technique as well as the FUE, however I began practicing merely the FUE technique using the manual punch in 2004 and have since that time performed the same technique. In my own practice, I have witnessed amazing growth rates in FUE that is equal and surpass those of FUT. In my own personal practice, I use the manual punch combined with a technique that I developed, the DES or Sequential Method. I believe that the manual punch creates less damage to the donor area, thereby increasing the donor capacity in a positive way. Furthermore, it is in my opinion the most effective method to achieve the best overall homogenization that allows for a natural look.

Koray Erdogan, MD
Istanbul Hair Restoration Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 26 reviews

Donor Strip vs Punch technique

There is not golden standards in surgery including hair transplantation. We need to keep in mind that the donor harvesting is only One Step of the hair transplant procedure (six steps), each step is critical for a successful outcome of the surgery. I offer both donor harvesting techniques to my patients. The initial consult and visit is critical for learning patient's concerns, goals and expectations. I discuss with them about the pros, cons, side effects and complications of each donor harvesting and surgical techniques during my consult and I costumize my surgical plan and technique for each patient. Sometimes the strip technique is the best option, sometimes de punch technique (FUE) is the best option and sometimes both (combo technique), it depends of each particular case and patient.

David Perez-Meza, MD FISHRS
Spain Hair Restoration Surgeon

Strip Surgery or FUE for Hair Restoration Surgery

Every surgeon gives a different answer to this question.
Here are some guidelines to understand better this topic.

1. Most surgeons do either one of these techniques or are much better in one of them. Opinions of these surgeons may not necessarily reflect truths of current science.

2. There is a value to each surgical technique. Every patient needs to be analysed individually for the formulation of the best treatment plan. 

3. Strip takes advantage of the skin laxity, where as FUE uses the extra density for individual harvesting of grafts. Since the principle behind each technique is different, frequently both techniques will be necessary to use the full donor capacity in a multi-staged surgical plan. The question then may be which one to choose first.

4. FUE is the current trend for hair transplants; thus it is impossible for a surgeon to speak against it, if he doesn't want to loose business. For this reason we will hear a lot about the disadvantages of the strip, but not FUE.

5. If we decide that both techniques will be necessary in the long run, then it may be wise to start with strip surgery first. Strip protects untouched donor area for FUE, but FUE uses the whole donor area.

6. In certain situations we may choose to do a FUT+FUE combined procedure. These are situations when there is a demand for a very high graft number, patients with limited donor availability, patients with previous surgery, patients with need of scar repair together with a hair transplant. 

Ali Emre Karadeniz, MD
Turkey Plastic Surgeon
4.7 out of 5 stars 17 reviews

FUE leaves dots, Strip leaves a line

FUE leaves dots, Strip leaves a line. Both methods should give similar results but the difference is the harvest method.  Some argue strip will give you slightly better results because the harvest quality is better.  However FUE method allows you to keep your hair very short.

Jae Pak, MD
Los Angeles Hair Restoration Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 100 reviews

Follicular Unit Extraction FUE or Strip for Hair Transplant FUT?

I usually explain both techniques to patients if I feel that he/she is suitable for both.
Generally I prefer FUE for young patients, men who have thick hair that comes out at large angles, men who crop their very short,  and also ones who need a very small number of grafts
Generally I prefer Strip or FUT if the patient has long and soft hair with no intention of a short hair cut and unable to shave their head for the procedure. Obviously these men also have no problem with a linear scar hidden with their hair at the back
In short the advantage of FUE is no linear scar, and the ability to choose more of the larger groupings of hair to create more density. With FUT, the advantage is more subtlety in the recovery stage and the ability to harvest thousands of grafts from the most central and dense part of the donor. It also generally cheaper
In short, its good to be able to offer both methods to best suit the individual patient. If the surgeon is equally adept at both then there should not be much difference in the cosmetic result of the hair transplant.

Bessam Farjo, MBChB
Manchester Hair Restoration Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 1 review

These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.