I am 5'9 170 lbs with broad shoulders and very wide breasts. I am having a BA with scar revision. My current bra size is a 36DD. I want upper pole fullness. I have already had an anchor lift and I have no upper pole. My PS says to get the upper pole I need no less than 450 cc's and probably 500 with a wide implant. I'm just wanting to get some other opinions. Thanks.
Answer: Going with large implants Switching to larger implants may give you more upper pole fullness but only for a short period of time. They will gradually drop just like your current ones did and you will end up in the same situation you have now. To fully answer your question please send photos.
Helpful
Answer: Going with large implants Switching to larger implants may give you more upper pole fullness but only for a short period of time. They will gradually drop just like your current ones did and you will end up in the same situation you have now. To fully answer your question please send photos.
Helpful
February 13, 2013
Answer: Upper pole fullness
Implants will only add to your volume. If you are already a DD cup then I doubt you really want to do that, especially with such large implants. Some of my happiest patients are the ones who have breast reductions to lose some of that weight that is pulling through their neck and shoulders. It sounds like you simply might need a revision of your breast lift procedure in order to redistribute the volume that you already have rather than simply adding to it.
Helpful
February 13, 2013
Answer: Upper pole fullness
Implants will only add to your volume. If you are already a DD cup then I doubt you really want to do that, especially with such large implants. Some of my happiest patients are the ones who have breast reductions to lose some of that weight that is pulling through their neck and shoulders. It sounds like you simply might need a revision of your breast lift procedure in order to redistribute the volume that you already have rather than simply adding to it.
Helpful
February 12, 2013
Answer: 500 cc Implants for Upper Pole Fullness after Anchor Lift
In general, I typically place smaller implants if the only goal is upper pole fullness (maybe 275 cc to 325 cc moderate profile). This tends to fill the area well without creating too much projection. Also, I am trying to protect my patients from back, neck, and shoulder problems with such large breasts. However, I do create a very tight skin envelope, perhaps tighter than many, with the breast lift. You would have to be examined or pictures would have to be viewed to give a better answer. Kenneth Hughes, MD Los Angeles, CA
Helpful
February 12, 2013
Answer: 500 cc Implants for Upper Pole Fullness after Anchor Lift
In general, I typically place smaller implants if the only goal is upper pole fullness (maybe 275 cc to 325 cc moderate profile). This tends to fill the area well without creating too much projection. Also, I am trying to protect my patients from back, neck, and shoulder problems with such large breasts. However, I do create a very tight skin envelope, perhaps tighter than many, with the breast lift. You would have to be examined or pictures would have to be viewed to give a better answer. Kenneth Hughes, MD Los Angeles, CA
Helpful
February 12, 2013
Answer: Best Breast Implant Size/ Profile for Me?
Thank you for the question.
As you can imagine, despite your good description of body type and goals, it is not possible to give you precise advice online.
The best online advice I can give to ladies who are considering breast augmentation surgery is:
1. Concentrate on choosing your plastic surgeon carefully. Concentrate on appropriate training, certification, and the ability of the plastic surgeon to achieve the results you're looking for. Ask to see lots of examples of his/her work.
2. Have a full discussion and communication regarding your desired goals with your plastic surgeon. This communication will be critical in determining breast implant size/type/profile will most likely help achieve your goals.
In my practice, the use of photographs of “goal” pictures (and breasts that are too big or too small) is very helpful. I have found that the use of words such as “natural” or “upper pole fullness” etc means different things to different people and therefore prove unhelpful.
Also, as you know, cup size varies depending on him who makes the bra; therefore, discussing desired cup size may also be inaccurate.
3. Once you feel you have communicated your goals clearly, allow your plastic surgeon to use his/her years of experience/judgment to choose the breast implant size/profile that will best meet your goals. Again, in my practice, this decision is usually made during surgery.
I hope this (and the attached link) help.
Helpful
February 12, 2013
Answer: Best Breast Implant Size/ Profile for Me?
Thank you for the question.
As you can imagine, despite your good description of body type and goals, it is not possible to give you precise advice online.
The best online advice I can give to ladies who are considering breast augmentation surgery is:
1. Concentrate on choosing your plastic surgeon carefully. Concentrate on appropriate training, certification, and the ability of the plastic surgeon to achieve the results you're looking for. Ask to see lots of examples of his/her work.
2. Have a full discussion and communication regarding your desired goals with your plastic surgeon. This communication will be critical in determining breast implant size/type/profile will most likely help achieve your goals.
In my practice, the use of photographs of “goal” pictures (and breasts that are too big or too small) is very helpful. I have found that the use of words such as “natural” or “upper pole fullness” etc means different things to different people and therefore prove unhelpful.
Also, as you know, cup size varies depending on him who makes the bra; therefore, discussing desired cup size may also be inaccurate.
3. Once you feel you have communicated your goals clearly, allow your plastic surgeon to use his/her years of experience/judgment to choose the breast implant size/profile that will best meet your goals. Again, in my practice, this decision is usually made during surgery.
I hope this (and the attached link) help.
Helpful
Answer: Breast tissue everywhere, except upper, and all those scars It sounds like you have enough tissue already, but it is in the wrong place! I have found this to be the typical problem with the various types of "anchor" lifts. All those scars and everything is as the bottom (and often the sides) with no upper fullness. Often looks like an exaggerated tear drop! The term "perky" has to be deleted from your vocabulary. This is why I gave up on "anchor" lifts in the early 90's, even trying an earlier technique from S. America in the late 80's. Internal shaping and suspension with the vertical technique has allowed this change because the technique doesn't rely on a segment of tissue bringing in enough circulation to keep the nipple alive. I have re-done many women over the years that had "anchors" that were fine with their size but not the shape, as well as those that didn't like the size, either. I have found it safe.....and effective....to do the vertical technique with reshaping the tissue to get the upper fullness. No nipples have been lost in this reshaping. It has been interesting to notice that these re-do's usually do not require moving the nipple further up. But this reshaping of the tissues can make you look like you had a lift, even though the nipple hasn't moved!If you don't like your present size at DD when you are supported by a bra, then an implant may be necessary.....besides all the other techniques mentioned. Just putting an implant in will just give you a bigger version of what you have.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful
Answer: Breast tissue everywhere, except upper, and all those scars It sounds like you have enough tissue already, but it is in the wrong place! I have found this to be the typical problem with the various types of "anchor" lifts. All those scars and everything is as the bottom (and often the sides) with no upper fullness. Often looks like an exaggerated tear drop! The term "perky" has to be deleted from your vocabulary. This is why I gave up on "anchor" lifts in the early 90's, even trying an earlier technique from S. America in the late 80's. Internal shaping and suspension with the vertical technique has allowed this change because the technique doesn't rely on a segment of tissue bringing in enough circulation to keep the nipple alive. I have re-done many women over the years that had "anchors" that were fine with their size but not the shape, as well as those that didn't like the size, either. I have found it safe.....and effective....to do the vertical technique with reshaping the tissue to get the upper fullness. No nipples have been lost in this reshaping. It has been interesting to notice that these re-do's usually do not require moving the nipple further up. But this reshaping of the tissues can make you look like you had a lift, even though the nipple hasn't moved!If you don't like your present size at DD when you are supported by a bra, then an implant may be necessary.....besides all the other techniques mentioned. Just putting an implant in will just give you a bigger version of what you have.
Helpful 1 person found this helpful