{"id":23178,"date":"2022-06-21T12:00:57","date_gmt":"2022-06-21T19:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https://www.realself.com\/news\/?p=23178"},"modified":"2023-10-12T13:17:12","modified_gmt":"2023-10-12T20:17:12","slug":"high-definition-liposuction-pros-cons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https://www.realself.com\/news\/high-definition-liposuction-pros-cons","title":{"rendered":"Doctors Debate: The Case for and Against High-Definition Liposuction"},"content":{"rendered":"

Debate is fundamental to medicine—it encourages critical thinking and drives scientific progress. And the field of aesthetics is no exception. At cosmetic conferences, doctors routinely (and respectfully) spar onstage, hashing out procedures and protocols that have sparked controversy or divided the industry. For better or worse, plastic surgery provides no shortage of hot-button issues—from the Brazilian butt lift<\/a>’s evolving safety profile to the most sensible approach to treating breast implant illness<\/a> to the does-it-or-doesn’t-it dispute around filler’s ability to lift the face<\/a>. These debates are fueled by evidence—there’s almost always data to support both viewpoints—and can be passionate and persuasive, but rarely is there a clear winner or loser. Rather, it’s on us to weigh the facts and adopt a stance.<\/p>

In the spirit of healthy discourse, we bring you our new series Doctors Debate<\/em>, where two esteemed physicians argue the merits of buzzworthy treatments. Here, in our first installment, we’re exploring high-definition liposuction<\/a> (aka abdominal etching) with Dr. David A. Sieber<\/a>, a board-certified plastic surgeon in San Francisco and high-def proponent, and Dr. Adam Kolker<\/a>, a board-certified plastic surgeon in New York City who does not support the procedure. <\/p>

During high-definition liposuction, plastic surgeons, aided by ultrasound energy, remove fat from various layers in order to carve out the underlying musculature. While the abdomen is a common canvas, the technique can also be applied to the arms, chest, back, thighs, and other parts. High-def requires specialized training—and scrupulous patient selection—and results can run the gamut, from subtly toned to muscle-suit fake. Critics commonly express concerns over how etched bodies may heal in the short term or wear over time, particularly if patients fail to maintain the rigorous fitness regimen that qualified them for the operation in the first place. <\/p>

Ahead, our experts make the case for and against high-definition liposuction—and we attempt to tease out a bottom line on the safety and efficacy of this popular procedure.<\/p>

The case for high-definition liposuction<\/h2>

According to Dr. David A. Sieber<\/em><\/p>

\n

“High-def allows me to take someone who is really active and make them look like all their hard work is actually doing something.” <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>

“High-definition lipo is a type of liposuction that was more or less invented and popularized<\/a> by Dr. Alfredo Hoyos<\/a> of Colombia, who’s been performing it now for 18 years. It’s a method that [American plastic surgeons] aren’t trained on—you currently need to leave the U.S. to learn how to do it well. In the U.S., we’re taught to just remove areas of stubborn fat [via traditional tumescent liposuction<\/a>]—we’re getting the fat wet with a solution and then sucking it out. High-def is different in that we use some sort of technology, typically ultrasound—a machine such as VASER<\/a>—to help emulsify the fat, and we’re removing fat in more superficial areas, with the purpose of creating more definition in line with the patient’s anatomy.”<\/p>

Who is a good candidate for high-def liposuction?<\/h4>

“Those who get the best results from high-def lipo are thin and fit. They eat right and exercise yet, despite their efforts, still can’t achieve the results they desire. High-def allows me to take someone who is really active and make them look like all their hard work is actually doing something. High-def lipo is not for someone who doesn’t work out or eat well, it’s not for someone with a high BMI, it’s not for someone with skin laxity. A lot of high-def doubters see it as being a substitute for regular liposuction—but that’s not necessarily true. It’s for a very well-defined category of patients—it’s not a procedure for everyone. <\/p>

“The whole point of high-def is really to expose the muscles underneath in an anatomically safe fashion that’s specific for that patient. So if you don’t have a lot of muscles, you’re not going to have a lot of definition unless we leave a whole lot of fat [in an attempt to accentuate areas where muscles exist]. And to me, leaving excessive amounts of fat just looks silly. High-def liposuction is all about peaks and valleys—knowing where to take fat from and knowing where to leave some of the fat. <\/p>

“I realize a lot of doctors are against this procedure, but I don’t have any reservations. The reality is, with high-def lipo, each surgeon performing the operation will have their own aesthetic, from very natural looking to really sharp, angular, and sort of fake looking. And it’s true, some aesthetics are not going to age well. But if you do the technique properly and you’re really making sure you’re adhering to the patient’s anatomy, it should age just fine.<\/p>

“I think that arguing about potential weight gain is nonsensical. It doesn’t matter what type of lipo you do on someone, if they gain weight in the future, that result probably isn’t going to look good. If someone gets pregnant after high-def, I can’t predict how they’re going to look post-pregnancy, because I don’t know what’s going to happen with their skin and muscles—there’s a huge genetic component in play.<\/p>

“I’ve become increasingly more blunt with patients about how important it is to maintain a healthy lifestyle after this surgery. It’s like, if you were to buy a Ferrari and put vegetable oil in it instead of premium gasoline, you would ruin your investment, right?<\/p>

“As with any other procedure, there are certain risks—but if your surgeon is trained properly and has the correct instruments, it’s not a dangerous operation. It’s not going to create a bunch more morbidity [complications] after. In my own personal hands, I have fewer contour irregularities now doing high-def than I did with basic lipo. To me, the outcomes are worth the risk.” <\/p>

<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/path><\/g><\/g><\/g><\/svg><\/div>
View this post on Instagram<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/a>

A post shared by David Sieber MD, FACS (@dr.davidsieber)<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/blockquote>