TJ Swan

Didnt Last-Santa Maria, CA

Wish I Hadn't... - California

(updated) Acne is gone, but so is my HAIR!!! - California

They are "moving around"and sag because even though they are sub-facial (which is hardly anything at all) they are not under the muscle. I have this problem too. Mine are 11 years old, and am going to have them removed. If removal isn't an option for you, a larger diameter implant would actually fit your chest much better. That would "fill in" the gap between your breasts and go up higher on your chest, which is what I think you meant by "no volume on the upper part of your breast". They do seem a bit low, but not bad by any means What projection implant do you have - low, moderate, high profile? Saline or silicone? Did your PS have you use sizers prior to augmentation, or did you just go with whatever the PS recommended? Why did you go sub-facial rather than sub-muscular? You can private message me if you want. Good luck Hun.

Congratulations rungirl, I am so glad you are already on the road of recovery. You look fantastic, you're new hubby won't be able to keep his hands off you! lol

Are you serious, or is this some kind of joke?

YOU WILL LOOK FAKE! - not modest at all. I'm small like you, 5' 1" 105 lbs and have 450 cc high profile saline's and I look rediculous! (I'm planning my implant ex-plant). Your current breast size looks great w/ your athletic build. Have you gone for any consults w/ PS? What has been their suggestion? I can assure you, it wasn't in the 400cc range. Go online and make yourself some nylon/rice bag "boobs" (you can convert cc's to ounces online very easily to make your "sizers"). Also check out the implant manufacturers websites and compare implant diameter/projection. My 450's make me a 32F!!!! I cannot find bras ANYWHERE!!!

The best "natural" results are the breasts you already have. You have beautiful breasts right now, think long and hard on your decision to get implants, and check out the Ex-plant forum. These are not lifetime devices.