Yes, well first FDA says the drug is not safe.
How is not safe if it has been in use and "into eye" used. Eyelash products go on eyelashes, they may occasionally get in the eye but thats not the use.
So if the argument is saved on the safty issue Allegran states that it is their patent. Prostoglandin is no longer under patent as an ingredient. There may be some limitation and patented use for latanoprost thats what Allegran is fighting in court. However since the ingredient is no longer under patent, I want to see their patented "means of use" as they claim they have one. Why did take Allegran so damn long to actually consider manufacturing this eyelash inhancer if the public is hungry for it. Also, I mean come ON ! can I patent the use of sugar in my coffee. Yes I can but that is RIDICULOUS. Allegran and FDA are money hungry irresponsible bunch of crooks. FDA has approved many harmful ingredients in foods, drugs, and cosmetics without any problems. FDAs purpose it to make sure money is to be made and not to keep the public safe. Have anyone noticed that drugs that are prescription only and FDA states it is due to theitr safety years after Patents expire become mainstream non prescription drugs such as prelosec, or even the vaginal anti fungus cream. I think Allegran will NOT WIN as this is a REDICUOLOUS LAW SUIT.
Recent comments
Posted to Allergan to cash in on lash enhancer on 25 Jun 2008