I never went back to the doctor to see my 'after' shots because I KNOW that there was NO improvement at all. I am 60, good skin tone, no fine wrinkles, just beginning to show signs of sagging along jaw line - a perfect candidate according my doctor. I did take my own pictures with my own camera and believe me, no difference. I am not so sure that my situation is 'odd' - seems like many on this board are having same results. I started to do facial exercise on my neck and I see more of an improvement in 4 weeks than Ulthera. Don't waste your money.
My doctor has me waiting 3 months also. I have read so many different waiting times but 3 months does not seem out of the ordinary. I had 2 vials 5 weeks ago and do not see any change.....waiting and hoping.
I just posted my final decision post and NO, it's a thumbs down - NOT WORTH IT!
I think there are many posts on this board from people who have something to gain by writing positive comments. It's a big waste! Sorry to be so blunt, but I did have high hopes for this one. I am disappointed.
Recent comments
Posted to Not Worth Cost - Texas on 31 Mar 2012
Posted to Sculptra Worked then Collagen Vanished! - Columbus, OH on 20 Nov 2011
Posted to Not Worth Cost - Texas on 9 Jun 2011
I think there are many posts on this board from people who have something to gain by writing positive comments. It's a big waste! Sorry to be so blunt, but I did have high hopes for this one. I am disappointed.
Posted to Did Ulthera Today - Connecticut on 9 Jun 2011
My takeaway on this after 3 months is that it does NOTHING and is a bunch of hipe --it's painful and expensive and I have nothing to show for it.
I only did my lower face and I know now, that it was not worth it.
To my PS who performed the procedure: I would have considered coming to you for a future surgery on my face, but I now question your integrity.
Posted to Lipo W/ Fat Transfer to Breast - Pittsburgh, PA on 25 May 2011