Anthony was found "Not Guilty" be her peers. YOU were not asked to try or judge the case. Therefore your opinion is irrelevant.
America is based upon the rule of law. According to law, she was arrested and tried before an open court. The law allowed her a fair trial as it would anyone in similar circumstances. Under the law, the prosecution failed to present enough evidence to find her guilty of First Degree Murder.
The snippets of the trial I saw and read left me wondering, "Where is the prosecution's evidence?" A boatload of circumstantial evidence that can't be tied together and suggests others paths is not something that should be used to put a person to death. The jury was correct.
The purpose of a trial is to decide if a person is guilty of a crime. It is not to codify your (and Nancy Grace's) preconceived and ordained claims of guilt. The defense doesn't prove her innocence, the State has to prove her guilt.
I'm sorry you hate America and her justice system of not incarcerating everyone you don't like.
A "Not Guilty" verdict means a court (including a jury) found there was insufficient evidence to convict a person of the crime. It does not mean they didn't do it. There is "reasonable doubt" the accused did the crime.
Innocent means the person did not do the crime. Courts only declare a person is innocent in very rare cases. This is almost only when on an appeal, there is overwhelming and conclusive evidence presented that the person found guilty in an earlier trial, did not do it. Then the Judge may find the person innocent of the crime.
Recent comments
Posted to What's All Over Her Arms? Kim Kardashian Confesses on 28 Jul 2011
Posted to Casey Anthony Guilty...of Plastic Surgery? on 28 Jul 2011
Posted to Casey Anthony Guilty...of Plastic Surgery? on 28 Jul 2011
When our nation falls to the level of having Nancy Disgrace decide a person's guilt then the unfounded claims will mean something.
Posted to Casey Anthony Guilty...of Plastic Surgery? on 28 Jul 2011
America is based upon the rule of law. According to law, she was arrested and tried before an open court. The law allowed her a fair trial as it would anyone in similar circumstances. Under the law, the prosecution failed to present enough evidence to find her guilty of First Degree Murder.
The snippets of the trial I saw and read left me wondering, "Where is the prosecution's evidence?" A boatload of circumstantial evidence that can't be tied together and suggests others paths is not something that should be used to put a person to death. The jury was correct.
The purpose of a trial is to decide if a person is guilty of a crime. It is not to codify your (and Nancy Grace's) preconceived and ordained claims of guilt. The defense doesn't prove her innocence, the State has to prove her guilt.
I'm sorry you hate America and her justice system of not incarcerating everyone you don't like.
Posted to Casey Anthony Guilty...of Plastic Surgery? on 28 Jul 2011
A "Not Guilty" verdict means a court (including a jury) found there was insufficient evidence to convict a person of the crime. It does not mean they didn't do it. There is "reasonable doubt" the accused did the crime.
Innocent means the person did not do the crime. Courts only declare a person is innocent in very rare cases. This is almost only when on an appeal, there is overwhelming and conclusive evidence presented that the person found guilty in an earlier trial, did not do it. Then the Judge may find the person innocent of the crime.