“Dysport for Lines Between Brows - Not Working for Me”

MODESTO

Not Worth It
Spent: $575 in Schaumburg, IL

Comments (3)

Updated 5 Jan 2010

Posted 30 Dec 2009

i had dysport inyecte in my forehead for lines and between my brows and have not seen any improvment.not very good for me i think i will go back to botox.

i had dysport done on the 28 of december it has been 3 days and i have not seen my self any better. i had 144 units i think it is more money than botox. i had botox done 2 time and it took faster than this.should i wait longer? thank you

This review is the subjective opinion of a RealSelf member and not of RealSelf, Inc.

Helpful review?

My Doctor: Join for free to view doctor's name

i think they do not perform the proceder they tell they ofer you. i also did a chimical peel and saw nothing no peeling.

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

tried but failed 6 Jan 2010

Are the units different for botox and dysport? 144 units sounds like a lot. Is it?

butterflyinthewind 6 Jan 2010

Dysport requires more units than botox. While usually cheaper per unit it really is a wash because of the amount required. It is said that Dysport works quicker but does not seem to be the case with you. Give it 10 days and see what happens.

MAMAMIA 9 Mar 2010

Yikes! 144 units sounds like you got overcharged. Are you sure your right? I'd like to know where you had the injections. I know you need more than Botox, but I had my "crowsfeet" done with Botox for $285, and just tried Dysport with 60 units for $240; plus there is a $75 dollar rebate so I made out with the deal!

Get Free Email Updates

“Dysport for Lines Between Brows - Not Working for Me”

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

Read more Dysport reviews

Doctors Nearby

Get Free Email Updates

“Dysport for Lines Between Brows - Not Working for Me”

Comments (3)

Post a Comment

Read more Dysport reviews

Doctors Nearby

Related Dysport Q&A