CT
CT
2 posts
Ventura, CA

“Radiesse--not necessary unless you are just testing”

Radiesse: NOT worth it

Cost: $1,200
Pain: Mild
Radiesse satisfaction: Fair2 Star Rating: Fair

I've had Radiesse twice. It was the best thing out there at the time for dermal fillers. Lasts a decent amount of time and looks natural. It's fairly costly, so don't go into it lightly.

First of all, I have to say, doctors rarely level with their patients about how long temporary fillers last. Other than Artefill, most dermal fillers disappear after some time, Radiesse lasting longer than many but still disappearing over time. And it disappears faster in areas where there is greater motion. So the first place that Radiesse goes away is in nasolabial folds—big bummer! Cheek injects last longer.

Secondly, never have Radiesse, or any other filler, injected in a thin-skinned place such as your temples. An experienced doctor will not, but mine did--I had a small lump on one temple for a few months.

Thirdly, there is some spreading of the product. You may have your cheeks injected, but some of the filler will gravitate to your eyelids--all the fillers I have had did that with me. Puffy upper eyelids--no fun and not pretty at all. Luckily this can be lessened by sleeping elevated the first three or so nights after injections.

The good news is that Radiesse is safe and if you are merely TESTING the look to see if you want permanent filler later, then it's a great option.

But if you want good price/value and if you want a real, long-term solution, skip Radiesse--you'll be throwing your money away. Now this is because Artefill, which has been used effectively in Europe for 10 years, has been approved for use in the US (Oct. 2006). It's permanent and it costs about the same.

So Radiesse to test and Artefill for the real deal--that's my best recommendation. I wish I had the money back that I spent on Radiesse so I could get Artefill instead.

Oct 9, 2007Comments and replies (1)

9 of 9 people found this review helpful
Helpful?
This review is the subjective opinion of a RealSelf member and not of RealSelf, Inc.
Suzie Park
unregistered guest

20 Jan 2008

Caution: Artefill is not a bad choice, but its permanence has bad/good consequences and it's not been around very long. It just received FDA approval at the end of 2006 (even though it has been used in a different formulation called Artecoll in Europe and in Canada) and the FDA is again reviewing a number of fillers as a precaution amid complaints (many fillers, not Artefill specifically). Wow. I wish there were more full-proof fillers out there.

Write a comment

After submitting, you will be asked to join or sign-in

Comments for unregistered users are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines

Last modified 25 months ago