Radiesse before & after photos
59%
437 reviews
Worth It Rating Our index shows the percentage of community members saying this was "Worth it". See cosmetic treatment rankings
Radiesse Cost $1,100 average cost

Radiesse--Not Necessary Unless You Are Just Testing

2 posts
Comments (1)
Updated 9 Oct 2007
Posted 9 Oct 2007
Not Worth It
Spent: $1,200 in Ventura, CA
I've had Radiesse twice. It was the best thing out there at the time for dermal fillers. Lasts a decent amount of time and looks natural. It's fairly costly, so don't go into it lightly. First of all, I have to say, doctors rarely level with their patients about how long temporary fillers last. Other than Artefill, most dermal fillers disappear after some time, Radiesse lasting longer than many but still disappearing over time. And it disappears faster in areas where there is greater motion. So the first place that Radiesse goes away is in nasolabial folds—big bummer! Cheek injects last longer. Secondly, never have Radiesse, or any other filler, injected in a thin-skinned place such as your temples. An experienced doctor will not, but mine did--I had a small lump on one temple for a few months. Thirdly, there is some spreading of the product. You may have your cheeks injected, but some of the filler will gravitate to your eyelids--all the fillers I have had did that with me. Puffy upper eyelids--no fun and not pretty at all. Luckily this can be lessened by sleeping elevated the first three or so nights after injections. The good news is that Radiesse is safe and if you are merely TESTING the look to see if you want permanent filler later, then it's a great option. But if you want good price/value and if you want a real, long-term solution, skip Radiesse--you'll be throwing your money away. Now this is because Artefill, which has been used effectively in Europe for 10 years, has been approved for use in the US (Oct. 2006). It's permanent and it costs about the same. So Radiesse to test and Artefill for the real deal--that's my best recommendation. I wish I had the money back that I spent on Radiesse so I could get Artefill instead.

This review is the subjective opinion of a RealSelf member and not of RealSelf, Inc.

Vote: 9 members found this review helpful

Comments (1)

Suzie Park (unregistered guest) 20 Jan 2008
Caution: Artefill is not a bad choice, but its permanence has bad/good consequences and it's not been around very long. It just received FDA approval at the end of 2006 (even though it has been used in a different formulation called Artecoll in Europe and in Canada) and the FDA is again reviewing a number of fillers as a precaution amid complaints (many fillers, not Artefill specifically). Wow. I wish there were more full-proof fillers out there.

Post a Comment

Use of this website and the posting of any reviews or other content on this website constitutes acceptance of the RealSelf® Terms of Service. The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider. © 2011 RealSelf, Inc. All rights reserved.