“Zerona - Slimming and Easy”

The difference that I notice between the photos is so mild that I can easily attribute it to a slight change in lighting, the arch of her back or the placement of her undergarments. I know that when we spend a lot of money we want to justify to ourselves that we got something in return, but that doesn't mean we did. Furthermore, given how tempting these quick fixes are, I need to assure that I'm getting my money's worth - is a 1 inch change in circumference worth $2,300 of your hard earned money? A $10 dollar per month gym membership could do the same job over a longer period of time. I'm very skeptical about these procedures, particularly those for which the outcome is decided solely by patient satisfaction, rather than a tangible measurement like percent body fat. I would love to hear how the physician who treated this woman measured her outcome, if she would be so kind as to share.

I have to agree with Fwah also. There is no difference. The lighting is better and you are further away from the camera so it gives the illusion of a slight difference because of the slight distance. But there is no changes I can see either.