“SO Much Better Than Botox--love It!”
I'm not sure why anyone would choose NOT to use Dysport--it either costs the same or is cheaper; works MUCH faster (I could see results within 24 hours vs. 4 or 5 days with botox); and supposedly lasts longer. What's not to like?
I will say it seems to hurt more than botox--not during the injections but afterwards. My forehead was sort of swollen for the rest of the day and felt kind of tender/bruised for a day or so. I noticed it starting to work almost immediately, and within 24 hours it had already almost totally taken affect; definitely within 48 hours it had.
The result seems to be more uniform than botox--e.g. with botox when I got btwn my eyes and upper forehead, I would still have weird wrinkles above my brows when I raised them. With Dysport, I don't have that--it just looks more natural somehow, and seems to work over a larger area.
I didn't get my crows feet this time and do admit I was a bit reluctant to use Dysport near my eyes. I asked the nurse who did my injections about the truth behind the talk about Dysport spreading into surrounding areas more and she said that is just a rumor, probably started by botox--no supporting evidence.
I also got a $75 rebate!
I would definitely, definitely recommend Dysport and I will not be going back to botox.
This review is the subjective opinion of a RealSelf member and not of RealSelf, Inc.
Comments (3)
Post a Comment