What would work better for me, UltraShape vs. CoolSculpting?

Both CoolSculpting and UltraShape can work well to reduce abdominal fat
in the right candidate. CoolSculpting works by freezing fat cells, while
UltraShape uses targeted ultrasound energy to destroy them. Ultimately, the
device used doesn’t matter as much as the skill of the doctor performing the
treatment, though CoolSculpting is more efficient in terms of time, as one treatment
reduces the area by 25% - 30% if combined with massage and Ultrashape usually
requires 2 -3 treatments for the same percent fat loss. CoolSculpting though is
only effective if the fat is loose enough from the body to be suctioned into
the cup that freezes it. So which is
more effective depends on the area and type of fat. I recommend visiting a board-certified
dermatologist with experience with both devices to find the best treatment plan
for you.

I also believe that ultra shape is a great procedure as there is no downtime or pain. We have being doing  a lot of treatments in our office with very good outcomes.You also have to watch your diet as well while you are doing these procedures. It works best when you diet and exercise. 

I use both Ultrashape and CoolSculpting in my practice, as well as other non-invasive body contouring devices and techniques. The most important factor in giving a recommendation is the in-person physical assessment to determine which treatment modality would be best for each individual patient. Given your description, either Ultrashape or CoolSculpting could potentially fulfill your needs OR neither could be appropriate for you. Best to see an expert with experience in all manner of body contouring for their advice. Good luck!