Ask a doctor

Which is Better for Spot Reduction of Fat - Zeltiq or Ultrashape?

Slim, with stubborn abdominal fats and love handles

Doctor Answers 10

UltraShape for non-invasive body contouring

Thank you for your question. I recommend patients interested in non-invasive body contouring technologies to UltraShape for a few reasons. UltraShape is a painfree, non-invasive procedure for the removal of diet and exercise resistant fat. It is done in a series of 3 treatments scheduled 2-4 weeks apart. UltraShape has more flexibility to customize treatment zones. I recommend you meet with a qualified physician in your area for a full consultation.

New York Dermatologic Surgeon
3.5 out of 5 stars 15 reviews

Ultrashape vs other non-surgical techniques including Zeltiq and CoolSculpt

For patients interested in a non surgical method to slim their profiles due to external ( different than the fat accumulated within the abdominal cavity or "peritoneal" fat )  fat deposits and bulges UltraShape and Zeltiq (fat freezing technique) both work.

UltraShape treatment has no discomfort and is usually side effect free.

Victor Michalak, MD
Issaquah Dermatologic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 2 reviews

UltraShape for abdominal fat and love handles

UltraShape body contour is very effective in permanently removing abdominal fat and love handles.  Usually 3 treatments are performed, 2 to 4 weeks apart.  I always recommend a healthy diet and exercise to maintain the results.  Patients are very happy with UltraShape treatment.

Martie Gidon, MD, FRCPC
Toronto Dermatologist
5.0 out of 5 stars 20 reviews

Coolsculpting VS. Ultrashape for spot fat reduction

We are fortunate enough to have both these technologies in our office. We perform a number of body contouring treatments in our office every week. We never take a "cookie cutter" approach to treating any one body. We decide on the treatment plan based on the patients weight and fat distribution, the integrity of the skin and the desired outcome. We also consider what the other problem areas are, and what the patient will focus on "once that bulge is gone." For quite a few of the patients seeking fat reduction there is also an issue with skin laxity. Once we remove or reduce the unwanted fat the skin laxity remains so we address that at the same time to enhance the outcome. 

Consultation should always be the first step in the process, we can assess and help you prioritize the treatment areas so you can have the best result possible

Deborah Atkin, MD
Del Mar Dermatologic Surgeon

CoolSculpting vs. UltraShape

The right treatment will vary depending on the person, which is why it is important to have an in-person consultation with a board-certified doctor. Generally, love handles respond best to Coolsculpting and abdomen fat is usually well suited for UltraShape. 

Margaret Weiss, MD
Baltimore Dermatologist
3.5 out of 5 stars 6 reviews

Coolsculpting is choice for spot fat reduction.

The best thing out there that is non invasive is Coolsculpting by Zeltiq for spot fat reduction. It focuses right on the problem area and predictably reduces the fat layer by 20 to 25% with a single treatment.  I have not seen any other treatment that can do that.

Susan Van Dyke, MD
Paradise Valley Dermatologic Surgeon
4.5 out of 5 stars 18 reviews

Zeltiq is the way to go

Zeltiq has more scientific evidence supporting that it is effective. Consistently, patients have 20-25% reduction in the areas of fat that are treated. I would invest your time and money in Zeltiq. Furthermore, 30,000 + patients have been treated thus far, and most seem to be happy.

Mohiba Khan Tareen, MD
Minneapolis Dermatologic Surgeon
4.5 out of 5 stars 10 reviews

UltraShape vs CoolSculpt

I recommend Ultrashape for a number of reasons:

CoolSculpt (Zeltiq) is older technology. It works, but there is often discomfort reported with the treatment, it takes more sessions, the applicator paddles do not fit all body parts or shapes, there can be bruising,  numbness and paresthesias (unpleasant sensations) afterwards that usually go away with time. I have seen some ridges above the applicators of untreated fat that now must be addressed.

In contrast UltraShape has none of these limitiations. UltraShape is a non invasive, non painful, quick procedure with no downtime for mild to moderate fat reduction whereas liposuction is invasive and reserved for more aggressive fat removal. UltraShape® is a non-surgical treatment option that instantly and selectively breaks down fat cells in the targeted area/s, as well as tightens the skin. The targeted fat cells are released through the body’s natural metabolic processes. The treatment is performed in-office and requires no needles, incisions or anesthesia. There is minimal discomfort during the treatment and no bruising, swelling or downtime afterwards. Essentially a “walk-in, walk-out” 45 minute procedure. UltraShape® can be used to contour: Flanks, Abdomen and Thighs

Larry S. Nichter, MD, MS, FACS
Orange County Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 63 reviews

Zeltiq Coolsculpt and UltraShape Fat Reduction

UltraShape and Zeltiq Coolsculpting are different technologies to reduce circumferential fat.  The systems work very differently to destroy fat.  One of the main differences is that Coolsculpting is using cooling for fat destruction whereas, UltraShape uses non-thermal, selective ultrasound to permanently destroy fat cells.

Craig Mezrow, MS, MD
Philadelphia Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 6 reviews

Zeltiq or ultrashape

Zeltiq is the non-invasive modality available in the United States.  Ultrashape is sitll not available.  But for a spot size, you  may just want a direct liposuction of that one area.

Steven Wallach, MD
Manhattan Plastic Surgeon
4.5 out of 5 stars 19 reviews

These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.