I'm seeking a permanent non-surgical nose job filler. However after reading many reviews on artefill, it seems like granulomas are common. A few surgeons have told me that granulomas were common with the old artefill formula but not with the new one. I do see that silkon-1000 is often used for non-surgical rhinoplasty and the percentage of satisfaction seems much higher. Is silikon 1000 safer than artefill? If injected correctly would granulomas still occur several years down the line?
Is Silikon 1000 a safer permanent filler compared to artefill?
Doctor Answers (3)
Is Silikon 1000 a safer permanent filler than Artefill for non-surgical rhinoplasty?
Silikon-1000 is considered very safe for non-surgical rhinoplasty.
Some people have granulomas with Artefill; plus, how long Artefill lasts is somewhat variable. Silikon-1000 has been successfully used for over 50 years in the United States; Silikon-1000 is the trade name for medical-grade silicone, an FDA-approved product for inside the eyeball. But it is appropriately used, off-label, as a microdroplet injection underneath the skin of the nose.
Non-surgical rhinoplasty works because tiny drops of Silikon 1000 are injected just under the nasal skin. Over time, the body walls off those drops with new tissue which provides the plumping action to fill in divots or marks in the nose. The same effect can happen with plain salt water to provide a preview how the nose will look on completion of treatment. The Kotler Saline Demo lasts perhaps two hours, but long enough to take a photo of what the finished nose will look like.
Robert Kotler, MD, FACS
Artefill compared to Silikon 1000
You might also like...
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.