Is subfascia the same as above the muscle breast augmentation?

Sub-fascial placement of a breast implant does place the breast implant above the muscle and beneath the breast.  However subfascial breast augmentation is different from Sub-glandular or sub-mammary breast augmentation.  Sub-glandular breast augmentation places the implant beneath the breast gland but on top of the muscle and muscle fascia.Subfascial breast augmentation places the implant beneath the fascia a thick membranous covering of the pectoralis muscle.  Therefore the implant is still beneath the gland and on top of the muscle but has an extra layer, the fascia covering the implant.  Many plastic surgeons feel this improves support for the implant and leads to few or capsular contractions than simply placing the implant under the breast.However sub-muscular implant, placing the implant beneath the muscle  is a technique preferred by most plastic surgeons today.  Placing the implant under the muscle provides better coverage of the implant and in my opinion significantly reduces the chance of capsular contraction.

Hello! Thank you for your question! Breast augmentation is a procedure often sought by women to increase size, add upper pole fullness and projection along with improve shape and symmetry of her breasts. Women who have the breast augmentation done report increased self-confidence, self-esteem, and more comfortable with her body. In fact, it has been the most popular procedure in plastic surgery in the US for the past few years. In general, implant size does not correlate with cup size. The cup size itself will vary from manufacturer to manufacturer as well as who is doing the actual measurements. Thus, cup size or implant size is never a reliable indicator for your breast size. I typically encourage my patients not to communicate her desires in cup size but more on the actual look and appearance. Your breast width is the most important measurement. Things to to consider during your consultation, which your surgeon will discuss with you, include implant type (saline vs silicone), shape/texturing of implant (round vs shaped/textured vs non-textured), implant position (sub pectoral, subglandular, or subfascial), incision (inframammary fold, periareolar, axillary, or TUBA), and size of implant. This can be performed with/out a breast lift, which would serve to obtain symmetry in breast size or nipple position as well as improve shape. Good communication between you and your surgeon of your expectations is warranted - choosing your surgeon wisely is the first step. Discussion of your wishes and having an honest and open dialog of your procedure is mandatory. I have found that photographs brought by the patient is helpful to get a visualization of the appearance you wish for in terms of size, shape, fullness, etc. In addition, your surgeon's pre and postoperative photographs should demonstrate a realistic goal for you. Once this has been accomplished, allow your surgeon to utilize his/her best medical judgment during the procedure to finesse the best possible result for you after preoperative biodimensional planning and fitting the right implant for your breast width. Too large of implants for the woman often destroys the breast pocket and breast shape, thus creating an oft seen uncorrectable problem later. Very slightly less tissue may be visualized with subglandular implants, but not very significant.Implants may be placed either in the subpectoral (beneath muscle) or subglandular/subfascial (above muscle). Subfascial is above the muscle, but below the overlying (fascial) covering of the muscle itself.   Both locations are excellent and you can choose either one - your surgeon will discuss the pros and cons of each. In general, while a placement above the muscle is a more natural position for an implant to augment the actual breast, I find that it is not desirable for very petite women or women with a paucity of breast tissue - as the visibility and potential rippling seen/thinning of tissue may give a suboptimal outcome. A subpectoral pocket adds additional coverage of the implant, but causes slightly more and longer postoperative pain/swelling as well as the potential for animation deformity with flexing of the muscles. Today, there is no virtually no difference in rupture rate, capsular contracture rate (slightly higher with subglandular as well as certain incisions), and infection with the positions. As you see, there are a few factors to decide upon for incision, placement, and implant type/size. Consult with a plastic surgeon who should go over each of the options as well as the risks/benefits. Hope that this helps! Best wishes for a wonderful result!

Good morning!Yes there is a difference.  Subfascial may provide greater support to the implant position than sub glandular.Another consideration for you is submusclular placement which is even better support.  Consider asking about that as an option.Thanks for asking!Dr Ellen Mahony