Radiesse: Q&A
Ask a Question
Any Negatives to Using Radiesse or Restylane for Chin Augmentation?
I know it doesn't last as long, but is chin augmentation using Radiesse or Restylane less effective or not as natural as a surgical implant?
Tags:
14 Doctor Answers |
Asked by
straw
in NJ
+2
Disadvantage to NS Chin Augmentation
In my opinion, the ONLY disadvantage to using Radiesse (I don't believe Restylane is a good filler for the chin) is that it is temporary. Other than that, it is a wonderful tool to use for chin augmentation, especially because the procedure can be guided in real-time by the patient.
see video
+1
Negatives to Radiesse or Restylane
A filler, such as Restylane or Radiesse is as effective and natural as an implant, but the downside is that it isn't permanent and will require that you come back for more product as it is dissolved overtime. A surgical implant is the only permanent solution for chin augmentation.
+1
Any Negatives to Using Radiesse or Restylane for Chin Augmentation
Radiesse and Restylane and Juvederm will give great results for chin augmentation with proper injection techniques. The main problem is lack of permanency. Cost wise it would be better to have a chin implant procedure which is permanent.
You might also like...
Real Stories
Dr. Bapna Was Amazing! - Columbus, OH
One month shy of my 40th birthday, I had a moment when I saw a photo of myself and didn't...
+1
Radiesse and Restylane in the Chin
The biggest negatives to Radiesse and Restylane in the chin is the amount of filler needed and the need for repeat injections. Based on cost and aesthetics, a chin implant is the better option for the vast majority of patients.
+1
Fillers for Chin Augmentation
Fillers can be used to augment the chin area, however, the results are not as long lasting as an implant. The choice of filler depends on the objectives of the treatment. Generally, radiesse will provide a longer result and more firm. Using hyaluronic acids would require a lot of material and would be cost prohibitive. I prefer to use a chin implant, however, the use of fillers gives a good idea of what result is expected. Thank you.
Miami Facial Plastic Surgeon
+1
Radiesse, fillers for Chin Augmentation
Dear Straw
Radiesse is an excellent filler for Chin Augmentation (this is an 'off label' indication). The injection can be done in 15 to 20 minutes in the office with very precise results that can last a year or more. The benefits include- no operative downtime, precise contouring- the posterior jawline can be shaped as well, a chance to see what a permanent implant can look like, very little risk of complications.
You can have bruising- this can last up to 10 days. Radiesse has very few...
more
+1
We use Juvederm for chin augmentation.
Hi!
The only negatives to chin augmentation with fillers are that, as you say, it is not permanent, and that poor injection technique can lead to a bad result.
In Manhattan, we use Juvederm. Restylane does not last as long, and Radiesse, when injected very deep, can lead to unwanted bone formation.
+1
Injectable fillers work well for minor chin enhancement.
The most reliable, permanent method to enhance your chin is with a silastic Chin Implant (silicone elastomer). This is a relatively inexpensive procedure, with little downtime, and a long track record of safety.
That being said, I have personally used injectable fillers to improve a chin that needed just a pinch more, after Chin Implant surgery. This provided subtle improvement that was satisfying for my patient and me.
So if your chin needs only mild enhancement, injectable fillers are an...
more
+1
Radiesse will work but the effects will not last as long as an implant obviously
Thanks for your question.
Radiesse is safe and does work well for chin augmentation, but you do need to use a lot of Radiesse to make profound changes, and those changes will wear off over the course of 1-1.5 years. A chin implant may be the best way to go to get long lasting chin augmentation, both in terms of results and overall cost.
In direct comparison of Radiesse and Restylane, Radiesse is a better choice for chin augmentation as it is used deeper and will last longer.
Good luck!...
more
+1
Lots of filler required
It certainly is possible to achieve similar effects to a chin implant with fillers, but the cost could add up as several syringes of filler would be needed. Additionally, the fillers will be metabolized and need replacement. You may want to consider a chin implant. If you post some pictures, we may be able to give you more specific advice. Good luck.
+1
Filler for Chin Augmentation
I agree that a chin implant is the better option, but obviously requires a surgical procedure and is subject to complications (albeit rare). I have used fillers (I prefer Radiesse for this) for chin augmentation and have been very happy. This is a good option for those who are not sure if they want a permanent implant, or for those who do not a an invasive procedure. I have been happy with 2 vials of Radiesse for this and the results will last around 1 year.
+1
It will work but will need a lot of filler
If you need a surgical chin augmentation, you will likely require at least a few cc's or syringes of filler, which can get quite expensive. Either filler your mention will work, but of course, they are temporary. Sometimes I will use filler to simulate results for patients who may be reluctant to have a surgical chin augmentation. Lastly, fillers can be shaped and injected precisely, but are not as firm as an implant. Chin augmentation is simulating bone so it should be firm. Various...
more
+1
One more option for chin augmentation
Both Radiesse and Restylane are great options for augmenting the chin temporarily. Many of my patients have been extremely pleased with the result. You could also consider Sculptra which can give you customized augmentation for up to two years. Just pick an experienced physician, as not everyone may be familiar with the technique. Good luck!
+1
Chin
Surgically placing a chin implant is a permanent solution. Injecting fillers will also augment the area to a degree but often not give as much augmentation and, of course, are not permanent. I have used Restyland & Perlane for this and patients have been pleased.
Comments (1)