Proslimelt vs. Ultrashape and other noninvasive slimming

Hey, did you get the proslimelt done? how were the results.. am thinking of trying it. Appreciate feedback before putting in thousands

• View 4 replies
• reply

Don't waste your money on Proslimelt! Each session costs AED 2500/ not worth it at all!

• View 8 replies
• reply

Thanks alot for your reply

• reply

one more question, do you use any kind of mesotherapy in conjuction with treatment with proslimelt, and how frequent do you use the proslimelt itself? is it evey 3 weeks or less?

• reply

So Stacey...did you try it or not yet?

• reply

Has anyone tried proslimelt? Is it good? I've heard about it but don't know if it's readily available in the UK - can anyone help me?

• reply

Dr. Joy Shah's comments are biased as well, since he's the distributor himself. I suggest trying Narl Lipo. It has been tested in Japan, and is not a product of a marketing company like Promoitalia, which does not have a solid research background.

• reply

I recently had it done in Melbourne, Australia and lost 1.5cm off the back of one leg and 1cm off the back of the other. I'm quite fit so don't need to tone the muscle just 'spot reduce' which training and diet can not do. I found it to be wonderful and although not cheap it's worth it if you get results. If you are healthy your body can rid the waste via normal means which is does on a daily. I was advised to limit my food intake and drink lots of water and do some mild exercise after the treatment and the days to follow. It's idea to have treatments in conjuction with a healthy diet and exercise plan which I'm following :O)

• View 1 reply
• reply

The fact is that - over 1000 patients are treated in my clinic on proslimelt. The patients satisfaction index is 92.7% and thats more then doubled then that of ultrashape and other radiofrequency based devices. THe average- reduction after 3 sessions is 7.5cm in the patients having BMI between 30 to 35%. This reduction is not dependent upon the consistancy of fat. It will be same weather it is loose fat or densely situated fat. The Only requirement is availibility of fat. In those patients where BMI is less then 30% the average reduction after 3 session is aproximateely 4cm and above. We have also scored another analytical parameter - that is pinch fold. We gurentee 80% reduction of pinch fold with just 3 sessions - of proslimelt- with a lasting and effect over 36 months with maximum variation of about 5% in measurments. Now let me talk on your device dr.mish, I have used ultrashape also and it is still in my clinic and if you are considering it as a clinical research, then let me tell all the facts that - ultrashape is a marketing gimic and false propogenda. Its mis leading the doctors. LEt people decide what is correct but its a mear fact that - You have to put patient on dieting or modified diet prior to the treatment of ultrashape to acheive the same results. If the technology is generating 3 and 6 cm as claimed falely on the web site, let me tell you that to generate 6 cm on ultrashape is only possible with the dieting prior and during the treatment. THe results are more with the dieting and less with the ultrashape. The actual results at the end of 3 sessions are average 2.75 to 3 cm maximum even in BMI Under 30% and absolutely no results AFTER BMI 32%. It has no effect on diabetic patients and I have full fludge study that is conducted on the same. ALso THe worst part of ultrashape is that they hide the facts. Ther are changes in the cholesterol studies and we can confirm that. Dr.mish, i would also suggest you that we are talking about ultrasounds and not the sonic belts when you are talking about NARL technique. Alao i am serving the company as a medical support and trainings. Why dont we operate the devices to gather and clear each other doubts? I prove my skills and you prove your skills, lets write on this the truth - that we see as an end result of our challange.

• reply