I am considering otoplasty and I looked at Dr.Merk's stitch method... it sounds too good to be true, it really sounds like magic, is this something I should consider? or is this something unrealistic that could bring complications?
Otoplasty Alternative - Stitch Method?
Doctor Answers 7
Stitch Method-Otoplasty Alternative ?
It has been asserted in the postings in this forum that the stitch method cannot pin all ears. That is not correct. Whoever writes that is not familiar with the method, or is not using it correctly, or is using another method. With the stitch method, all ears, regardless how thick or hard the cartilage is, can be successfully pinned and in ears with a big deep cavum conchae, also. Unfortunately, many colleagues often lump the stitch method together with the “Incisionless Otoplasty” by Fritsch, although there are many differences between Dr Fritsch’s “Incisionless Otoplasty” and the Stitch method. The Fritsch method is significantly more invasive than the Stitch method, especially as Fritsch scores the cartilage. Scoring is, however, an unnecessary step backwards towards the traditional methods and is associated with numerous risks, as reported in the literature. These risks no longer occur at all with the stitch method, as the entire cartilage is not worked on, nor is it scored.
Kind regards from
Priv.Doz.Dr.med.W.Merck, Konstanz, Germany
There are several techniques that are used to perform otoplasty. The "incisionless" or minimally invasive technique is a viable option for some people. This will depend upon what makes your ear protrude. An examination of your ear by an experienced otoplasty surgeon would be the best way to determine if this is right for you.
There are several anatomical configurations of the ear that make it look prominent. There are many different techniques that need to be blended through the appropriate surgical approach to deal with a prominent ear. The antihelical fold is sometimes absent, which makes the ear stick out further from the side of the head. Cuts in the cartilage and meticulous suturing techniques are performed through an incision behind the ear. If part of the problem is a prominent cartilaginous conchal bowl, then a portion of this needs to be resected, removed, and sewn back down closer to the side of the head. This is an outpatient procedure, done under local anesthesia and takes approximately an hour to an hour and a half to perform.
You might also like...
When you perform an otoplasty you try to correct the parts of the ear that are abnormal. Any one particular technique will not work for all otoplasties. The objective is to do the least amount of tissue manipulation that will give you a long lasting result with a normal appearance. Discuss you ear appearance with a plastic surgeon and see what is required.
Alternate methods for Otoplasty
I have been performing incisionless otoplasties for six years now and, even though not all patients are candidates for this procedure, it is a long lasting and excellent technique. I find that most people are candidates for this operation with less than 20% requiring some cartilage excision or other modifications. The technique is the same as the Mustarde sutures that my colleague mentions, but the difference is that the stitches are placed through the skin and buried under the skin. If you find an experienced surgeon with this technique you should consider it if you are deemed suitable for it. Best of luck.
Dr. A. Gantous
Prominent ear, ear correction, stitch method
In my experience only suture method has high incidence of recurrence particularly in adults with thick cartilage. Otoplasty is very challenging because of recurrence, hence most prefer to modify the shape of cartilage with direct access to break its memory and prevent re-occurence.
Methods of Otoplasty
Things that seem too good to be true frequently are. Use of sutures to reshape the ear is a method that has been around for many years. The original description was by Dr. Mustardé. The difference in his and the present method is the lack of incision with the present. Over the years, I have found the suture method applicable about 20% of the time. The others have required something else in order to make the procedure lasting. I really see little advantage to the “stitch method.” All methods are done as an outpatient under minimal anesthesia or local, and both have almost no recovery. Instead of concentrating on a method, find a surgeon with significant experience with otoplasty who can show you good results.