I feel I can address this question very well, since I had PRK on both of my eyes in 1994! My prescription was about a -5.00, so on the moderate scale of things, though the laser systems in place at that time were pretty rudimentary compared to today. I can say nothing but positive things about my PRK surgical experience, as well as my long term results. I have had no regression of effect of PRK, though we did see that in a small group of patients with the early lasers. Regression using the modern laser systems we have today is hardly ever a problem. I have a little bit of night time glare(also described as halos or starbursts), but that has nothing to do with the PRK procedure itself, and more to do with the fact that the early lasers did not treat as wide a diameter of the cornea as today's lasers do. We hear very few complaints about glare today. My healing process was swift and I feel I reached 20/20 within about the first 7-10 days. To put it in a worldly way, I had PRK on a Thursday at 5PM, I rested a good bit over the weekend, and performed a whole day of cataract surgery on Monday! I still perform a good number of PRK procedures, although many patients choose Lasik because the recovery is a little faster. Clinically, I have found both PRK and Lasik to give equal visual results, though the final visual result takes a little longer with PRK.
Web reference: http://www.kameen.com