If implants are placed over the muscle does this increase your chance of CC?

I have been to two plastic surgeons in Australia who have both said I could go either under or over the muscle. I was leaning toward going over the muscle because the recovery time is quicker and I like to do weights in the gym. I'm worried because everything I read suggests that the capsular contracture rate is higher if you go under the muscle. Is this true?

Doctor Answers (8)

Breast augmentation

+2
Is my opinion the implants placed under the muscle tend to have a softer and more natural look because the muscle drapes gently over the top of the implant. When implants are placed above the muscle, particularly in the very thin patient the result can look like a coconut stuck to the chest. There is also clear evidence that capsular contracture rates and infection are lower when implants are placed under the muscle and that mammography is better. For my athletic patients, which is about 99% of my practice, when they go to the gym and bench press or weight lift the implants will look less natural for that moment in time because the pectoral muscle pushes on the implants. But for the 97% of their lives, not bench pressing or weight lifting a submuscular implant I believe he is a much more natural appearance. While a woman with a fuller breast can sometimes hide a subglandular implant pretty well, a subglandular implant can burn bridges for patients who might want a breast lift in the future. A subglandular implant separates the breast tissue from the muscle. If the patient wants a lift in the future the blood supply to the nipple and the areola is more in jeopardy. Best wishes.


San Diego Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 4 reviews

If implants are placed over the muscle does this increase your chance of CC?

+2
    Smooth implants above the muscle may increase the risk.  There are several factors to consider here with your surgeon.

Kenneth Hughes, MD

Los Angeles, CA

Kenneth B. Hughes, MD
Los Angeles Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 238 reviews

Capsular contracture over the muscle

+2
The answer to your question is not a simple one. It depends upon the type of implant used some of the data suggest higher rates of contracture and others suggest similar or lower rates. Also, some of the data people refer to is based on older studies using earlier generation implants that did have higher contracture rates. 

The factor that is probably most related to the contracture rate of the implant is its ability to resist deformation. And that is likely related to the firmness of the filler (gel or saline) and the fill of the implant. 

It can be hard to make a decision as to what is best especially if your surgeon is not dogmatic and presents you with options. But, it is not always that one way is better that the other but rather that there are trade offs and if you should have an undesirable outcome which one would be easier to correct or would you be happy to live with. I see patients that have contractures and are not bothered by it and do not even know they have it. The trade off of going under the muscle is an animation deformity. 

My advice. Find a surgeon you trust, and have faith in. There are many choices to make and hopefully they can help guide you in to making the decision that is best for you.

David M. Kahn, MD
Palo Alto Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 3 reviews

You might also like...

Capsular contracture and implant position

+2
Sub-muscular positioning of implants tends to produce less capsular contracture than supra-muscular placement.
That being said, there are those that cannot have implants placed under the muscle without concomitant mastopexy (breast lift) because the muscle and breast tissue do not lie at the same height on the chest wall.

In your case, since your consultants have said that either position will work for you, I would favor the sub- muscular position.  A little more downtime for healing should really not be a consideration when a lifelong result is the goal. Only in body-builders with extremely thick pecs and professional athletes, where the muscle tension may be critical for swing and/or timing and strength, should one favor the supra-muscular procedure.

John Strausser, MD
Sarasota Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 2 reviews

Implant placement

+2
data suggests that capsular contracture may be higher with the implant placed in front of the muscle as you mentioned.  Subfascial placement may be an option for you.  You make this decision in consultation with your surgeon.  If you are not sure, a third consultation may be of benefit.

Todd C. Case, MD
Tucson Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 32 reviews

Studies have shown that risks for contractures

+1
are less when implants are under the muscle.  There are also other strategies that could be employed such as the surface of the implant (smooth versus round), whether a funnel or other similar device is used, and  the techniques employed by your surgeon as well as the incisions (least risk when incision under the breast).  You have to take everything into consideration and make the best choice for you.

Curtis Wong, MD
Redding Plastic Surgeon
4.5 out of 5 stars 17 reviews

Implant pocket and capsular contraction

+1
Yes, there are several studies that suggest that silicone implants above the  muscle have a higher risk of capsular contracture.

Steven Wallach, MD
Manhattan Plastic Surgeon
4.5 out of 5 stars 18 reviews

Capsular Contracture with Implants Above the Muscle

+1
Yes. There is an increase in capsular contracture in implants that are placed above the muscle.  Also, I feel that placing implants submuscular (under the muscle) gives you a better longterm outcome.

Robert Heck, MD
Columbus Plastic Surgeon
5.0 out of 5 stars 32 reviews

These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.