Do I Need a Lift/Advice Benefits of Going over the Muscle? (photo)
- Asked by Upforchange
- 1 year ago
Hi,I am currently looking to have a breast augmentation but wondered do i need a lift. I have had different consults with different opinions. I have also been advised I have enough tissue to go over the muscle, but regardless of how much tissue I have isn't under the muscle more beneficial. I get the feeling from my last doctor he wants to make this really EASY, but i want long lasting results. I am currenltly leaning toward saline over the muscle. I am 31years old, 2 kids 112lbs. Please help!
Benefits of Going Over Muscle #breastimplants
A few things I did not get was how large you want to be. That may affect whether you need a lift or not. So there are so many things with regards to saline or silicone above or below the muscle. I feel that a better long term result will be in the sub-muscular pocket. Capsular contracture rates are higher above the muscle and higher with saline above the muscle vs silicone. Below the muscle the contracture rates are the same for either silicone or saline. Above the muscle you will find more rippling of the implant with saline above the muscle than below the muscle. Your tissue will thin over time and with implants above the muscle you will surely have a great amount of visibility of the implant. This can happen with either silicone or saline but is more common with saline.
As to the lift. If the nipple is at or above the fold usually you do not need a lift, but if you have part of the breast tissue below the fold, pseudootosis, like you do sometimes if you do not go big enough you will need the lower breast skin removed. The lower pole of the breast is the worst part of the breast in my opinion in terms of quality of the tissue and skin. When I perform an augmentation and lift I usually get rid of that lower pole breasts skin and some tissue so the breast does not bottom out over time. The lift part is more of a physical exam call and how big you want to be. Bigger implants fill the skin envelope out better.
Lift? Not yet. Saline above muscle? NO!
Though my headline seems more definite, the answers my colleagues are giving indicate that there is no clear-cut consensus and therefore no "right" or "wrong" answer. Yet, the majority of us feel that saline implants have a higher likelihood for visible/palpable rippling, not to mention deflation risk (re-operation), and (above the muscle) a scientifically-proven increased risk of capsular contracture (big re-operation, and one that doesn't always "work").
Yes, there are issues with below-the muscle placement (activation distortion--less likely with proper muscle fiber release, and possible "double-bubble" if crease position is not chosen quite carefully), but the advantages of softer, more natural "feel" and less risk of capsular contracture far outweigh the disadvantages, IMHO. And silicone can never "leak."
You are young, slim, attractive, and don't need the increased scarring (probably) of a lift right now. And of course, a lift can always be added later if needed--In borderline cases such as yours I actually recommend augmentation first, and see if in fact it works out to my patient's and my expectations. If not, then I can "add" the lift as a second operation, but do so for the difference in cost between an augmentation with implants alone and a lift plus implants. That takes the financial disincentive of two operations out of the equation, though of course, the patient understands that a second operation and recovery is needed. But neither of these operations is really that tough on our patients!
Still, if you start with a lift plus implants, you'll never know if an augmentation alone (without the increased cost and scarring of a breast lift) was ever possible to give an aesthetically-satisfying result, won't you? You pay more, get much more scarring, but (usually--there is still always a small risk of possible need for re-operation) it's a one-operation and recovery procedure.
Think about this and perhaps get another opinion or two--any surgeon who would choose the "easiest" over the "best" is not going to get my vote of approval! Since none of us surgeons is "perfect," we had better always try for the best, since we can fall short on occasion. But that's why I think the factors above bear consideration. For several examples of women with moderate to significant ptosis (droop) for whom I performed augmentation alone without lift (all dual-plane submuscular/subfascial), click on the web reference link below and check out cases 5, 6, 11, 24, 27, and 31. Best wishes! Dr. Tholen
Breast Implant Placement
You are very astute with your feeling that the doctor wants to make this as easy as possible FOR HIMSELF. There are two issues going on here, one is the need for a lift or not, and the other is implant placement above or below muscle. Unfortunately these two issues are sometimes linked together (placement above muscle will negate the need for lift), but this is incorrect, despite many surgeons (and patients) believing this to be true.
Women with your breast appearance are at risk for being told that a large, usually high profile implant placed over the muscle is 'all you need to look great'. The reality is that it is unlikely to work for a majority of women, and that even those that look acceptable initially are likely to develop issues after a short period of time.
My advice to you is to get a dimensional analysis of your chest by a breast specialist who is certified by the ABPS and a member of the ASAPS. This will allow the surgeon to choose the appropriately sized implant. Planning of the surgery will include implant placement in a subpectoral position, and the addition of a breast lift to achieve a normal breast contour. Although some of the other doctors have said that your breasts don't have much ptosis, the reality is that a thorough physical exam is needed to determine this. However, I believe based on your photos that your nipple is clearly below your fold, and that is with your arms partially elevated. With your arms at your side, it would be even lower.
Best of luck!
Web reference: http://www.drminniti.com
Recent Breast Augmentation Reviews
Breast Augmentation Photos
Over versus under the muscle with lift
Hi, placing the implants below the chest wall muscle greatly reduces your risk for capsular contracture (hardening of the breast requiring more surgery). Also, by placing the implants below the muscle there is less risk of being able to feel the implants. Although, gel implants feel more natural than saline implants. Also, the larger your implants are, the more risk you will have for sagging of the breast. When the nipple is below the fold of the breast, a lift will give a nice shape so that implant lies in harmony with the breast.
Web reference: http://chicagobreast.com
Most women need lifts
You need silicone implants placed retro-pectoral. They give the most natural appearance and feel. You definitely need a lift. This can be done leaving only a scar around the areola. The goal of this procedure would be to lift your areola, lift your breast tissue and place implant high on the chest wall. Aligning all 3 in the same horizontal place will provide maximum projection and give you a more attractive appearance. You are a perfect candidate for a new technique called Breast Augmentation with Mini Ultimate Breast Lift.
Gary Horndeski, M.D.
Web reference: http://www.horndeski.com/gallery.aspx
IMPLANTS first and LIFT later
Choosing an implant size that is a little larger (think around 400-450cc or more) in size may give you the look you want. With your size of breasts and the nipple position, why don't you get the implants, let them settle for 1 year and then decide if you want the nipples higher. Under the muscle is the very best choice for many reasons. First, they will look more natural with a muscle covering, less rippling, and more protection for the implant. Hope this was helpful and as always be sure your surgeon is boarad certified to do plastic surgery. Board Certified Cosmetic Surgeon is NOT a legitimate board.
I feel that you need a lift as well as implants. If you are using saline implants, you definitely want them under the muscle. If they are above the muscle, you are likely to see some rippling of the implant under the skin.
Lift or sublgandular augmentation
Based on your pictures, you do have some post child bearing droop to the breasts. In all cases I never recommend sub-glandular saline implants. It is too likely that you will have visible or palpable rippling or wrinkling of the implant. I would probably recommend a sub-glandular silicone implant to fill out the deflated tissue and give you the most natural result. If you were very interested in a a sub-muscular approach I might recommend a small lift (peri-areolar) to centralize your nipples on the breast and prevent the appearance of droop of the breasts off of the implant. I hope this helps.
Daniel Medalie, MD
Web reference: http://www.ClevelandPlasticSurgery.com
Under the Muscle for a Long Lasting Result
Based on your photographs, a breast lift is not necessary. I would recommend saline or silicone gel implants under the muscle for a long lasting result with the fewest complications and risks. Good Luck!
What type of breast Implants should I get? (photos)
There is no right or wrong answer, only alternatives with expected advantages and/or disadvantages which may or may not materialize. Looks to me like formal breast lift unnecessary, but you have enough skin to accommodate high or ultra high (full) profile implants, and as of now, areola low. Choice may be to slightly lower inframammary crease, or select anatomically shaped implants. Only good examination and frank discussion with you will help determine best course.
Web reference: http://www.feelbeautiful.com
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.