After much research into both silicone/saline implants,I just wasn't comfortable with the complication rate of either,namely within five years of implant more than 40% of patients require a second. Also,reading many personal stories of women who had explant surgery due to various health problems including ruptured or leaking implants,especially pics of saline implants black with mold from faulty valves was disturbing. Fat grafting with stem cells sounds great,but very costly and not many ps do?
Fat Grafting with Stem Cells vs. Breast Implants
Doctor Answers 21
Fat Grafting with Stem Cells vs. Breast Implants
Have a question? Ask a doctor
Fat grafting for breast augmentation
We have started performing breast augmentation with fat grating over the preceding year with excellent results and satisfied patients in the limited and informed patients we have worked with thus far. There is a learning curve and this is being performed in a limited number of centers in theuntied states.
Breast augmentation via fat grafting is possible, but has its own concerns.
The published data on reoperation rates for implants based on the FDA core studies is 15% at 3 years for primary augmentation patients. I do not know where you got the 40% reoperation rate, but this in incorrect. As for fat grafting, it is definitely possible, however it has its own drawbacks. Here are some basics:
- You need to have modest expectations as to increase in breast size. Realistically, a cup size is about all one can expect.
- You need to have enough fat to harvest in order to inject. Extremely thin or athletic patients simply do not have the often 500-1500cc of fat necessary.
- The fat has to live after transplantation. If the fat does not become revascularized, it will die and be resorbed by the body. This can lead to issues with calcifications, fat necrosis, fat cysts, contour irregularities, and volume loss (often asymmetrically between two breasts).
- It requires a significantly longer operation - usually several hours more in order to harvest the fat, process the fat, and inject the fat.
- The "stem cells" are more marketing than reality. The increase in breast size is due to the addition of mature fat cells more than stem cell regeneration. The stem cells may have a role in increasing vascularity to the tissue after transplantation and research is beginning to show this role.
- The cost is significantly more, mostly due to the increase in the amount of work required.
We all would love a totally "natural" breast augmentation that improves other areas of the body and leaves us without worry of complications. Unfortunately, that does not exist. There are risks of any procedure. If you are willing to accept the risks of fat grafting for breast augmentation, then this may be the procedure for you. Be sure to see a plastic surgeon with extensive experience in this procedure. In the Washington, DC area, I would recommend Dr. Scott Spear at Georgetown University Hospital as I know personally that he has performed fat grafting for breast augmentation many times.
You might also like...
Stem cell instead of breast implants
Fat grafting to the breasts can be done but the results are really diappointing. The fat usually dissolves with time and the amount of enlargement is about one cup size. In my experience, the chances of re-operation with silicone implants is very small. I have been doing these for over 15years and I would be surprised if I have re-operated on 5% of my patients. They have proven to be safe and the manufacturers have improved the silicone implants so the chances of hardening or capsular contracture is about the same as with saline implants or about 10%. The satisfaction rate amongst my patients is very great. I am offering a all inclusive fee that is extremely reasonable as well as interest free financing for some patients.
Stem cell augmentation
You are right on both scores.The procedure is very,very expensive and few doctors do it.One concern is what happens to the fat that doesn't take? Can this cause suspicious calcifications? More needs to be done and more studies conducted.
Fat Grafting - Stem Cells. Good alternative
Fat grafting to the breast is a very reasonable alternative for the right patient. There is a volume limitation with fat injections to the breast that may make implants more appropriate. However, fat grafting can provide volume and it can be used to enhance specific areas of the breast. We have been using fat grafting since 1995 with predictable results and terrific patient satisfaction. It has become accepted for the breast in the last several years. Common uses besides the breast include, buttocks, face and hands for a variety of purposes. The key to the procedure is the technique the surgeon uses.
Fat Grafting for Breast Augmentation
A forty percent (40%) complication rate for primary breast augmentation? Can you quote the source of this? When the FDA put a freeze on silicone breast augmentation surgery in the early 1990s, one of the issues they highlighted was a "high" reoperation rate that plastic surgeons and implant manufacturers AT THAT TIME could not completely explain...however, since that time, a majority of the reoperative cases in studies since that time, have pointed to patient driven indications, namely, "bigger size, want a lift later, switch from saline to silicone,etc.". But a 40% complication rate as a blanket statement is a bit inaccurate.
NEXT, have you seen any GOOD before and after results from fat/stem cell transfer to the breast? I have not, at least NOTHING that looks as GREAT as traditional prosthetic breast augmentation. And, have you heard how many "treatments" it takes....at least 3 visits to the operating room! That's a HUGE expense....
NEXT, does it last? Well, plastic surgeons are performing controlled clinical trials to assess this and the verdict is still out. I was recently interviewed for a local TV station regarding this issue. The "other" MD they interviewed, who is NOT a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon BUT offers fat transfer to the breast for augmentation(?), tells her patients that she sees "greater than 90%" retention of the grafted fat! Unreal and unrealistic results as far as I am concerned. In the best of hands, 30 to maybe 50% of the transferred fat is retained in my hands....the results are ok to good. We are still looking into our results and as INNOVATIVE surgeons and scientist are researching the answers to long-term large volume fat transfer....BUT we are not there yet!
Sorry for the long-winded answer!
Hope this helps!
Grafting with Stem Cells instead of breast implants?
There is no FDA authorized stem cell procedure in the United States. There are many people claiming to do stem cell facelifts, stem cell breast augmentation, stem cell anything. This is a bit of smoke and mirrors. Anytime you do fat grafting you are actually transferring stem cells along with it so all Brazilian Butt Lifts can also be called Stem Cell Brazilian Butt Lifts. It is still not clear whether stem cell augmentation to fat grafting actually does anything. The whole idea is still quite experimental. You have done a lot of research on the Internet and possibly too much since you have come on some very gruesome sights with reference to breast augmentation. The vast majority of women are happy with their implants and love them. The 40% figure is vastly overrated and may have been published in some reconstructive series which has higher complication rates. In my practice reoperation is approximately 5%. You should go see a board-certified plastic surgeon experienced in breast surgery and discuss your concerns. There are several people around the country doing breast augmentation with fat. I have done some of this myself and it works. However it is a much longer and costlier procedure.
Stem cell grafting for breast augmentation
Stem cells are one thing and fat grafting is another but sometimes the names are interchanged. This is still experimental and if it is fat grafting you are talking about, may not give the volume that you desire.
Stem Cell Grafting to Your Breasts is Still Investigational
Stem Cell grafting for breast augmentation is still in its early stages. And while breast implants are far from perfect, the pictures you see of "moldy" valves and so forther are generally the worst case scenario and extraordinarly rare. In addition, as pointed out in previous posts it is better suited for someone looking for a very subtle enhancement and not more than about a cup size increase.
In my clinical experience, most patients will require a revision in their lifetime but few require it within the first several years following their augmentation. To increase your chances for a succesful surgery, I suggest that you do the following:
- choose a physician who is Board Certified in Plastic Surgery and who specializes in breast enhancement. In this day and age, seemingly ever physician is entering the ring and so you may not know who is the best and who you should avoid. Plastic Surgery training is an excellent first step and is obviously far more comprehensive than the weekend course or the physician who simply "shadowed" a plastic surgeon for a few weeks
- ask to see before and after's
- ask to speak with at least 3 actual clients who have undergone this procedure
And, finally, go with your gut. Above all, do not use price as a means to choose your surgeon. It is far more difficult to fix a bad result than it is to get it right the first time.
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.