Me and my husband are arguing about haveing the transaxillary incision. I'd rather do the Periareolar one. Which is best?
Transaxillary vs. Periareolar Breast Augmentation
Doctor Answers 34
My wife and I disagree on the incision!!??
you are not having the surgery. it is not on your body and you are crazy to do anything other than support her decision. if there is a sound medical reason to do one incision over the other then it is between your wife and her surgeon. so sit in the corner and nod.
Have a question? Ask a doctor
Compromise - use the Inframammary Incision!
This is compromise at it's best: neither of you get your first choice, but your wife ends up with a great - arguably the greatest incision.
Most patients and plastic surgeons sophomorically focus on the location of the scar as the most important issue in deciding on the incision. In fact, the scar is the least important distinction between the incisions.
Why? Because any of three locations almost always gives a good scar. When it doesn't, it is usually related to patient biology, such that someone who gets a bad scar in one location would get it in another. If any incision always gave a perfect scar, we'd all use it. And if any always gave a bad scar, no one would use it.
The transaxillary incision fundamentally doesn't makes sense to me personally: it is the only incision that is visible when fully dressed; when a revision needs to be done, it almost invariably requires another incision; you can lose sensation in the armpit making shaving difficult; unless done endoscopically, it is less accurate and typically more painful and bruised than other approaches; if done endoscopically, it takes much longer in surgery.
The periareolar yields a scar that is visible when the breast is viewed head on; the size of the areola can limit the size of the implant; the size of the areola and the amount of breast tissue limits the visualization and thereby accuracy and bloodlessness of the pocket dissection; and most important of all, dragging an implant through the breast contaminates the implant with the bacteria in the breast, the very bacteria implicated in capsular contracture (hardening.) The best study of its kind shows a statistically significant higher rate of capsular contracture with the periareolar incision than the inframammary incision.
The inframammary incision is hidden in the crease under the breast; it has the least swelling of hte breast since the breast gland itself isn't cut; it is an incision that can be used for any type of revision necessary in the future; it allows for complete and total visualization of the surgery; it allows all implant types to be placed with a minimum of trauma. And once augmented, the scar is up and under the breast, right at the crease where the breast meets the chest wall, an area that frequently has a bra mark that is even more visible than the scar itself.
My suggestion: go inframammary. From your relationship's point of view neither of you lose the argument. And from a medical point of view your wife gets what is to me the most reasonable incision choice.
Transaxillary vs periareolar vs crease breast augmentation incisions
The transaxillary incision is much less commonly used than it was several years ago. I have treated several patients from my area with misplaced implants through the armpit and even two whose doctors burned through the skin in the lower inner corner of the breast getting lost in where they were in the pocket dissection. Some revisions cannot be done through the armpit so another incision is needed. Finally, the numbness in the upper inner arm that can occur has made this less popular.
The areolar incision is nice but is sometimes limited in that some areolae are not big enough to place a desired silicone gel implant in through without damaging the integrity of the implant. A periareolar (around the entire areola) incision allows for larger implant insertion plus a modest breast lift.
Finally, the crease is a workhorse incision in this as any size implant can be inserted and all revisions can be done through the crease.
You might also like...
Best incision for breast augmentation
There are many great answers and I agree with most of them. Each plastic surgeon has their own philosophy. My best advice is to let your wife and her plastic surgeon decide. This is a big decision and she must consider not only the positives, but also the negatives.
The only advantage to the transaxillary incision is that you don't have a scar on the breast. There are, however, many negative to this approach: (1) a scar in the axilla can be seen when raising the arms, (2) if the scar becomes hypertrophic it may interfere with shaving, (3) the implants have a tendency to ride high because of the dissection during implant placement, (4) it is hard to place large silicone implants through this approach, (5) surgery time (and hence, your cost) tends to be longer, and (6) subsequent surgeries tend to require a second incision. In other words, when it's time to have her implants replaced, it is unlikely that your plastic surgeon with use this approach again - especially if she needs a breast lift or capsulectomy. The result is that now she will have two incisions.
The periareolar incision is a good approach, especially if she need a small lift at the same time. When it heals well it looks great. But there are a few things to consider. This approach puts the incision right on the breast. Therefore, if the incision doesn't heal well (scar hyperthrophy, widening, darkening) she will see this everytime she looks in the mirror. There is also an increased risk of infection. Nevertheless, if your wife has dark, moderately sized areolas, this could be a good approach.
Usually, I recommend the inframammary (under the breast) approach because it is quick, straightforward and the scar is well hidden when looking at the breast straight on. It is also easy to perform a revision through this approach. When I combine this approach with a dual plane breast augmentation (for ladies with some sagging after children) this gives a very nice predictable result.
Hope this helps
Transaxillary vs Periareolar Breast Augmentation
- no visible incision on breast
- incision well hidden in armpit
- can be more difficult to position implants precisely
- some surgeons are only comfortable with placing saline implants through this incision
- incision well hidden by areola border
- great ability to position implants in desired place
-increases the risk of decreased nipple sensation
- increases the risk of infection and loss of breastfeeding ability
What Incision is Best?
There are several ways to place the incision so that it is well hidden in natural skin folds or breast transitions.
- a.Hidden at the natural transition from the areola and the breast skin. The incision can be hidden in this natural color transition
- 2.Inframmary Fold
- a.The incision is hidden in the fold below the breast.
- a.The incision for the implant can be hidden in one of the natural axilla folds. I do these with the aid of scope which allows precise placement of the implant.
- Also the use of the Keller funnel has allowed the placement of larger silicone implants through the axilla.
No one incision is best for every patient and the majority of patients can have the implant placed through any of the three incisions listed above. When do correctly all three of the incisions are well hidden.
It is important to see your board certified plastic surgeon to help guide you to an implant that will give you an aesthetically pleasing breast.
Your choice, not his
Transaxillary vs Periareolar Incision for Breast Augmentation
Transaxillary vs periareolar breast augmentation
It is common for scars to fully mature for up to a year. In the meantime, there are a few things that may help to ameliorate your incision/scar. The most proven (as well as cheapest) modality is simple scar massage. Applying pressure and massaging the well-healed scar has been shown to improve the appearance as it breaks up the scar tissue, hopefully producing the finest scar as possible. Other things that have been shown to add some benefit, albeit controversial, are silicone sheets, hydration, and topical steroids. In addition, avoidance of direct sunlight to the incision will significantly help the appearance as they tend to discolor with UV light during the healing process. If unsightly scars are still present after approximately a year's time, other things that your surgeon may consider are intralesional steroid injections, laser, or just surgical revision of the scar itself.
Consult with a plastic surgeon your goals, concerns, and expectations. Certainly incisions should be considered, but should not limit your overall result by hindering visualization and access to your surgeon, and what produces the best results in his/her hands. The transaxillary incision is much less used today due to its blind approach and inability to shape the breast pocket as precisely as with the inframammary or even periareolar incision. Especially if you are in need of a breast lift, the periareolar incision may be the better option in this case.
Hope that this helps! Best of luck on your decision and for a great result!
There is no reason to argue about the best incision...
Breast augmentation can be performed utilizing either the inframammary, periareolar or transaxillary approach with either silicone or saline implants. There are pros and cons to any of the incision choices depending on each patient's unique situations. It is best to visit a plastic surgeon who is comfortable with all three approaches to help guide you in your choices for a great breast augmentation result.
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.