Is one better than the other for small areas of fat? I've read that coolsculpting can be a little painful for the first 10 minutes. Is liposonix painful in any way? Does one cost more than the other? Which type of fat is one better for? Does one remove more fat than the other? Is there better contouring with one than the other? If 1 inch can be lost in an hour with liposonix will I continue to see more inch's lost over 8 weeks? How many inch's can be lost with coolsulpting Thanks!
CoolSculpting Vs. Liposonix. Which One is Better For Small Areas of Fat?
Doctor Answers (4)
CoolSculpting Vs. Liposonix
Here in our practice, in which we have nearly every non-surgical fat reduction technology available, CoolSculpting is the most effective, reliable and consistent form of fat reduction. There is a slight discomfort for the first 5-10 minutes with the CoolSculpting due to the intense suction to maximixe the tissue draw. However, Liposonix is very painful for the duraction of the entire treatment and has less reliable results and much more bruising, pain and tenderness after the treatment. You can expect 20-25% of the fat in the area treated to be reduced with CoolSculpting. We recommend 2-3 treatments to maximize the results.
Web reference: http://www.FreezeTheFat.com
CoolSculpting by Zeltiq vs. Liposonix for fat reduction
The Liposonix device does cause pain during treatment. There is one treatment that in its one hour can cause fat loss over the months after treatment. It does not mean that one inch or a garment size might be obtained in one hour, nor can one guarantee such a result. The treatment takes one hour but the result can be significant and it can take time, months, to see the result. CoolSculpting may hurt for the first few minutes, but most patients feel comfortable during the treatment until the removal. 20 % reduction of fat may be seen at four months after its one hour treatment. CoolSculpting is limited by the applicators that fit the region to be treated. In the next several months, there may be a new applicator that will allow the doctors to treat more widespread areas, which until now has been a limiting factor with CoolSculpting. They are both good treatments, and some patients can benefit from both.
Web reference: http://www.thenyac.com/zeltiq/index.html
Coolsculpting by Zeltiq is the Only Non Invasive Fat Removal Procedure that is Biologically Selective.
Coolsculpting by Zeltiq utilizes a very specific biological principle to destroy far cells Selectively under Controlled Low Temperarures. These low temperatures exert no effect or damage on other nearby tissues (skin, nerve or muscle). It is very effective as a noninvasive far removal treatment, and now with the arrival of new larger applicators, significant areas of excess fatty tissue are being removed. Patient satisfaction remains very high with this procedure.
You might also like...
Liposonix vs coolsculpting for permanent body shaping fat reduction
Liposonix uses high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) which specifically targets a layer of fat about a half inch thick and a half inch deep, while coolsculpting (Zeltiq) is more of a bulk reduction of fat where it can be piched between the treatment paddles. Both are efective but I believe that Liposonix is more precise. The treatment takes about an hour to do but the reduction in fat takes several weeks to appear, which is also the same with Zeltiq because both destroy fat cells and the body then re-absorbs the tissue over time.
Web reference: http://baxterplasticsurgery.com/liposonix-treatment.html
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.
You might also like...
Ask a Doctor
Get personalized answers from board-certified doctors. For free.