Injectable or Implant for Sub-malar Hollowness?
- Asked by shellseeker25 in 01033
- 4 years ago
I have high cheekbones, but also hollowness in the sub malar region. I am considering an injectable or a sub-malar implant. Your thoughts? Thank you!
Promoted Local Answer Promoted local answers are based on Featured Doctor activity within your current location.
Submalar implant is a better alternative
A submalar implant is a better alternative and more permanent lasting than injectables for the submalar area. Injectables will have to be redone every three to five months, and an implant would be permanent.
Web reference: http://www.seattlefacial.com
Many options for injectable fillers for cheek hollowness
Patients today have multiple options for the correction of cheek hollowness with fillers. In our practice, the two most successful fillers are Radiesse and Sculptra for this problem. Patients must consider that Sculptra must be injected in several sessions for a complete correction of this deformity.
For submalar hollowness, there are 3 good options available which I usually present to my patients. Below, I include also some pros and cons of each approach:
1. Implants: permanent, surgery, 10 days recovery
2. Fat Transfer: long lasting (? permanent), minimal invasive surgery, 10 days recovery, may need second session
At the end, we like all of these approaches. At the end, our patients usually know what is right for them at this specific time in their lives.
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.