Should Implants Be Placed Under or over the Muscle for a Slim Frame?
- Asked by ANNAF in California
- 4 years ago
I'm pretty slim and if I pinch my upper chest skin I have less than 2cm. Every thing I have read tells me under the muscle is best. I don't know what to do?
Thin patient and implants
If you are very thin, then you are better off having as much soft tissue coverage as possible. The muscle adds another layer especially in the upper pole.
Under the muscle
If you have thin tissue coverage, then the best placement for the breast implant is under the chest muscle. It provides more coverage, better shape, better for mammograms and has been documented to have lower capsular contracture rate. The implants will move when you flex the chest muscle so patients who are body builders may have concerns about that but otherwise most patients who are thin will do better with under the muscle placement.
I generally prefer under the muscle
I generally prefer to place the implant under the muscle especially with a thin patient. There are many options in breast augmentation. Educate yourself about the different choices. The more soft over the implant the more natural the result. If you are thin and you place the implant above the muscle any degree of capsular contracture wiill give you a very rounded, implanted appearance. If your goal is a more natural result then below the muscle may be the best approach.
Recent Breast Implants Reviews
Breast Implants Photos
Under is recommended for most women
When I discuss this issue with patients, I recommend subpectoral (under the muscle) for women unless there is an unusual reason to do otherwise. Discuss with each of your surgeon choices why they advise the method they do.
Subpectoral placement generally improves mammograms, lessens capsular contracture risks, and contours smoothly over the upper portion of the implant. Thinner patients benefit more from the latter consideration.
Silicone gel filled implants have recently become more popular, since the FDA permitted their marketing by manufacturers, although saline are still very effective and safe.
2 cm or less of "skin" is good reason for subpectoral (under muscle) approach
If there is thin skin and soft tissue, it is best to place implants in the submuscular plane. The more soft tissue between the implant and the outside world, the better the result. There will be less visibility of the implant edges, less chance of rippling, and a more aesthetic contour i the upper portion of the breast. If the nipple position is above or slightly below the fold of the breast this is the best approach.
Under the muscle in general...
In general, the thinner you are, the more we prefer to put implants under the muscle in order to give you a better "cushion" and better tissue on top of the implant. It is difficult to say that it is wrong to put the implant above the muscle. These are very individual decisions. I would say that most would recommend below the muscle for a slim individual with thin breast tissue. Good luck.
Under the muscle
You have been given some good advice from the previous answers. I would recommend that you go under the muscle. With a small pinch test, the right answer is under the muscle. Even if you had a thicker pinch test the long term issues favor an under muscle pocket.
The silicone implant is always a good choice.
There is no best way to place breast implants
You have to decide what is important to you and what risk you are willing to assume. The reason why there are different opinions and techniques is that there are different advantages and disadvantages. Both can give acceptable results depending on what you want.
Rolls Royces are no better or worse than Ferraris. If you want a fast car, get a Ferrari. If you want comfort, get a Rolls. But personally, I drive a Mercedes and Honda. You get the picture.
Under the muscle technique is used mainly because it reduces the risk and incidence of capsular contracture or hardening, unfortunately, not to zero, though.
Theoretically, over the muscle technique is the most natural because that is where the breast normal lives. Nothing lives under the muscle except for the ribs! However, depending on the size and dimension of your implant, an under muscle implant can look very natural while an over the muscle implant can look very unnatural.
In the end, it is a combination of multiple factors that are interrelated, but not directly comparable, that you need to assess. There is no such thing as best, only choices. Your surgeons should discuss all factors with you. Having all the facts and option, you cannot make a bad choice. You will make the best choice at the time you make it.
Usually, the thinner you are, the smaller the implant you can tolerate above the muscle and the more the under muscle technique makes sense as the size of the implant increases. Of course,there comes a point when the size of the implant will make either technique more unnatural and riskier.
Under the muscle
Hard to say with out examining you but it sounds like you should go under the muscle. Better coverage of the implant, less chance of encapsulation most of us feel. If you are that thin then under the muscle will be more natural.
Under the muscle for sure
The thinner you are, the more you need to go under the muscle to maximize tissue coverage over the implant. The mammograms are better, the capsular contracture rates are lower, and the implants aren't as palpable, and they look more natural long term.
Web reference: http://www.randcosmeticsurgery.com
These answers are for educational purposes and should not be relied upon as a substitute for medical advice you may receive from your physician. If you have a medical emergency, please call 911. These answers do not constitute or initiate a patient/doctor relationship.