12 months ago
The controversy regarding systemic auto-immune diseases being caused by silicone gel breast implants have been adequately put to rest. They don't.
If you are suggesting that silicone was detected in your axillary lymph nodes and thus led to or confirmed the diagnosis of ruptured implants, then it is not necessary to remove the nodes themselves if they are not inflamed. The difficult question is what to do with intracapsular (gel remains inside the natural capsule of scar tissue) silent (non-symptomatic) ruptures.
Most doctors, and certainly lawyers, will say to replace them since the implants are not functioning as designed. The problem is, not all intracapsular silent ruptures will amount to anything -- that is, they might not cause any clinical symptoms and remeain aesthetically acceptable and soft. So how can you justify doing surgery on every such implant when the patient has nothing tangible to gain?
To complicate matters, we surgeons worry about extra-capsular leakage where the gel gets outside the capsule and starts to migrate through tissue planes. This is something we don't want to have happen and can require messy, deforming surgery to treat. All extra-capsular leaks starts as intra-capsular leaks but we can't tell which intra-capsular leaks will progress to the more serious extra-capsular leaks.
If you decide not to have the implants replaced, be sure to monitor the shape and consistency of the breasts and notify your surgeon if you notice any change.
3 of 3 found this helpful