My guess is that he is talking about a fully ablative erbium resurfacing. What it boils down to is that the risk of what he is proposing is greater - anesthesia, hypopigmentation, and scarring are much greater than the Fraxel re:pair which is done in the office. Also, the healing time and wound care are much longer with total ablative technology vs fractional ablative technology. If everything goes perfect, and your healing time is not prolonged (less than 2 or 3 weeks), you might get a better result. Total ablation has been around longer than fractional ablative. However, the trend is towards fractional which will give close to comparable results, with less downtime and less risks. All the buzz at meetings and all the laser companies want to market is fractional lasers.




