Fat Transfer Forum
52%
WORTH IT RATING
"Worth It Rating" shows the % of consumer reviewers
that stated the procedure was "Worth It" or not.
See more RealSelf Worth It Ratings
or Add Your Review

View Before and Afters
Average Fat Transfer Cost: $3,950
Learn about Fat Transfer
1,086 people and 471 doctors are talking about Fat Transfer
Get Free Email Updates
RE: Are fat transfer results permanent?
Posted 19 Mar 2010
View 23 doctor answers to Are Fat Transfer Results Permanent?



I am not a doctor and I don't work in a doctor's office, I just had a fat transfer in 2009 to my face and I love the results.
I wanted to add some fat to my forehead and temple areas as well a little more to my cheeks to soften lines so I had a second stage fat transfer back in November 2010 and so far the results are great.
When done by the right surgeon in a right area, fat is a wondeful thing.
Get your fact straight next time.
In 2007 doctors from the UCLA Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery wrote an article:
Conclusions: Although there is an increased trend in replacement of soft-tissue volume with autologous fat transfer, THE LITERATURE FAILS TO PROVIDE DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE OF FAT SURVIVAL. - Autologous Fat Transfer for Facial Recontouring: Is There Science behind the Art? Matthew R. Kaufman, M.D.Timothy A. Miller, M.D.Catherine Huang, M.D.Jason Roostaien, B.S.Kristy L. Wasson, B.A.Rebekah K. Ashley, B.S.James P. Bradley, M.D. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.119: 2287, 2007.)
Quantitative evidence of clinical fat survivability and predict-
ability of volume restoration DOES NOT EXIST- (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.
119: 2287, 2007.)
take that michhy! And who consents to have lumps under their skin??? Doctors who do not inform patients preoperatively that lumps are a consequence of fat grafting are commiting malpractice for lack of informed consent!
First of all, everyone's face frows with weight gain. Lumps may be made of tissue and tissue grows. The fact that tissue grows has nothing to do with it being fat tissue.... lumps could be fat tissue, scar tissue, bone tissue, or plastic balls for all we know,.... but lumps are lumps and can always be felt under the thin facial skin and are nothing similar to real fat tissue. Older people may not notice them because they lose feeling and sight with age.
If there is a lawyer out there, please start suing these doctors who do fat injections for malpractice!!!! Plastic surgeons are not informing patients preoperatively that lumps are a consequence of the fat injections. They are misleading patients to believe that there is maybe a possibility of a temporary pimple-like lump or a risk of lumps or no risk at all. By law they are required to inform patients preoperatively that the lumps are the actual product being sold and are a consequence (not a risk) of the procedure. The lumps are being used as a structural material to create volume and can be felt under the facial skin.
and let me correct you: they last as lumps. Who wants hard lumps under their skin? I have no doubt that all the little 3mm hard lumps last. I do doubt that the hard lumps are fat though. They are calcification or scar tissue and I know this because they are hard, not soft like fat.
there is no proof that the fat cells live and that you can't predict the outcome.
here is the article again, maybe you read it wrong michhy:
In 2007 doctors from the UCLA Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery wrote an article:
Conclusions: Although there is an increased trend in replacement of soft-tissue volume with autologous fat transfer, THE LITERATURE FAILS TO PROVIDE DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE OF FAT SURVIVAL. - Autologous Fat Transfer for Facial Recontouring: Is There Science behind the Art? Matthew R. Kaufman, M.D.Timothy A. Miller, M.D.Catherine Huang, M.D.Jason Roostaien, B.S.Kristy L. Wasson, B.A.Rebekah K. Ashley, B.S.James P. Bradley, M.D. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.119: 2287, 2007.)
Quantitative evidence of clinical fat survivability and predict-
ability of volume restoration DOES NOT EXIST- (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.
119: 2287, 2007.)