Kris Jenner Gets Facelift -- And Gets Sued?
Princess 19 on 9 Aug 2011 at 9:00am
Kris Jenner, the supermom of the Kardashian girls has recently been embroiled in a controvery of her own. But, it's not an adult video, thank goodness. It's for getting some work done.
The 55-year-old matriach of the Kardashian clan recently went under the knife to get "refreshed" for daughter Kim's impending August 20th nuptuals to NBA star Kris Humphries. The facelift, um er, claimed neck lift was well documented on an episode of Keeping Up with the Kardashians.
But hold on reality show watchers! Kris is a spokesperson for an anti-aging skin care line called Beautiful Eyes in a Bag. Any face work, according to the company, is a breach of contract (cue "whodunit" music now - da, da, DUM). B & P, the parent company, alleges that the surgery violates her agreement not to harm the reputation of the company and the product line.

Jenner insists the procedure didn't affect her face but simply tightened up saggy skin around her neck. Sure... (And how is the "neck area" NOT under the stipulations of the contract? Oh, that's right, it's the neck, not the face...)
Well, whatever it was, one thing is for sure. The surgery was documented and Kris, herself, admitted to some sort of work recently on CBS' The Talk.
"That was a brave thing to do. I had a little, you know, 'freshening up' for the wedding," she says. Ok, so she doesn't exactly admit what she had done.
Wait, didn't Kris go bananas on daughter Khloe for gaining "happily married" weight, thus jeopardizing her weight loss plan endorsement with Quik Trim products? Tsk, tsk Kris. This seems a bit all too hypocritical. No? Hmmm...the plot thickens.
Do you think Kris would be misrepresenting the skincare line with a surgically altered face?

To me, this isn't any different than those "Falsies" mascara commercials where the voice says "No false lashes needed" as the model throws hers away, yet she is CLEARLY wearing GIANT fake lashes.
I would guess that most celebs who endorse beauty products probably have had (at the very least) a little Botox.
It's noble that the skincare company has enough integrity to care, if that's the case. But it may be that they're just trying to draw attention to their brand.
She sure does! But yes, the fact that their brand is unknown even with her as it's spokeswoman is what makes me think that they will get more press out of this lawsuit than anything else -- and they know it!
~ Dr. Andy
We need a "like" button so I can like your comment momofbron
Haha I saw that clip too, heywood! It was a little odd how Kim "runs" all these fashion businesses and such, yet couldn't seem to say one word about "her" Sears line. Her sisters seemed a little more put together though.